2014
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.21658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Paraprotein on Platelet Aggregation

Abstract: Platelet aggregation was not significantly changed was confirmed with addition of human immunoglobulins.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of interest, IVIg was not able to restore platelet function, indicating a non-immunogenic impairment of ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation. In accordance to Djunic et al who performed systematic mixing studies and showed that adding IVIg to the reaction mixture was not able to restore platelet activity in vitro 15 , we have provided the first corresponding clinical evidence that IVIg fails to significantly change platelet aggregation capacity in paraproteinemic impairment. Platelet function and in-vitro bleeding time however subsequently normalized after high-dose melphalan therapy, presumably due to the general reduction of paraprotein burden.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Of interest, IVIg was not able to restore platelet function, indicating a non-immunogenic impairment of ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation. In accordance to Djunic et al who performed systematic mixing studies and showed that adding IVIg to the reaction mixture was not able to restore platelet activity in vitro 15 , we have provided the first corresponding clinical evidence that IVIg fails to significantly change platelet aggregation capacity in paraproteinemic impairment. Platelet function and in-vitro bleeding time however subsequently normalized after high-dose melphalan therapy, presumably due to the general reduction of paraprotein burden.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In MM and PCD, interference of paraproteins with the platelet VWF receptor (GPIb, CD42b) and collagen binding sites (GPVI, CD36) has been shown to cause a disturbed interplay of platelet cytoadhesive receptors and their ligands. In addition, paraproteins with specificity for GPIIIa have been found and resulted in a significant bleeding diathesis .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…19,20 Although this method was questioned for a lack of sensitivity to detect certain types of platelet disorders (eg, secretion or granula defects), these defects are not typically found in MM. 7 In MM and PCD, interference of paraproteins with the platelet VWF receptor (GPIb, CD42b) and collagen binding sites (GPVI, CD36) 21,22 has been shown to cause a disturbed interplay of platelet cytoadhesive receptors and their ligands. In addition, paraproteins with specificity for GPIIIa have been found and resulted in a significant bleeding diathesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been postulated that the paraprotein binds to platelet receptors involved in aggregation. This leads to prolonged bleeding time and, in some patients, causes unexplained mucocutaneous bleeding or bruising or in others can cause severe bleeding, resulting in hematuria or large hematomas [52,53].…”
Section: M-protein Related Bleeding Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%