2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of parking charges and time limit to car usage and parking behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
42
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Simicevic et al (2012) measured the user responses to parking fee increase events and found that 56% of users still drive to a CBD (Central Business District), regardless of the fee, but the proposed model does provide a solution that balances the supply and demand and results in a high utilization rate. Later, Simicevic et al (2013) evaluated and forecasted the effects of different parking-fee/time-limit settings. They found that, for a user, the decision to drive or not is mainly affected by the price of parking, but the choice of the type of parking service is mainly affected by the time limit factor.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simicevic et al (2012) measured the user responses to parking fee increase events and found that 56% of users still drive to a CBD (Central Business District), regardless of the fee, but the proposed model does provide a solution that balances the supply and demand and results in a high utilization rate. Later, Simicevic et al (2013) evaluated and forecasted the effects of different parking-fee/time-limit settings. They found that, for a user, the decision to drive or not is mainly affected by the price of parking, but the choice of the type of parking service is mainly affected by the time limit factor.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is as an efficient tool for Transportation Demand Management (TDM) (Kelly and Clinch, 2006) because it is a major policy that takes account of different modes of travelling behavior, so as to achieve a desired modal split of users. Although cordon (congestion) pricing has been shown to be a more effective way to manage congestion (Azari et al, 2013), parking pricing is the most common practical measure because of its ease of implementation (Simicevic et al, 2013). Parking pricing and the quality of transport are two important policies for sustainable urban planning that allow the management of demand to produce a balanced modal split and to reduce traffic congestions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang et al [19] proposed an idea of disequilibrium transportation planning based on disequilibrium theory and believed that travelers will not only consider the travel time (price) of the current route, but also the traffic flow (quantity) obtained from traffic information and historical experience. In the actual traffic management, congestion charges (e.g., Wu et al [20], Chiou and Fu [21], and Jia et al [22]) and parking charges (e.g., Washbrook et al [23] and Simićević et al [24]) are to change the travel decisions of some travelers through typically price regulation. Ramp control (e.g., Hasan et al [25] and Frejo and Camacho [26]) and public transport departure frequency optimization (e.g., Berrebi et al [27] and Wang et al [28]) are to change the travel decision of some travelers through typically quantity regulation, so travelers are subject to the double constraints of price and quantity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different parking policies, trip structure, public transit, traffic facilities, and other factors can influence parking demand distribution [2,3]. As the two main forms of parking policy, parking charge and supply policy significantly affect parking choice [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%