1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf01050675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of particle size on North Carolina phosphate rock on its dissolution in soil and on levels of bicarbonate-soluble phosphorus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased resin-P, 0.1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH)-P i and 0.1 M NaOH-P o concentrations were caused by the high degree of BGPR dissolution of 57-69% (Table 3B). This high degree of dissolution of BGPR is due to the acidic nature of the soil, the long period of experimental time (10 months) and very small particle size of BGPR used (150-250 µm) (Kanabo and Gilkes, 1988). The high P retention (92%) and low Ca concentration in the Allophanic Soil would also have promoted the enhanced dissolution of BGPR in the soil (Kanabo and Gilkes, 1987;Bolan et al, 1997).…”
Section: Bgpr Dissolution and Soil P Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased resin-P, 0.1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH)-P i and 0.1 M NaOH-P o concentrations were caused by the high degree of BGPR dissolution of 57-69% (Table 3B). This high degree of dissolution of BGPR is due to the acidic nature of the soil, the long period of experimental time (10 months) and very small particle size of BGPR used (150-250 µm) (Kanabo and Gilkes, 1988). The high P retention (92%) and low Ca concentration in the Allophanic Soil would also have promoted the enhanced dissolution of BGPR in the soil (Kanabo and Gilkes, 1987;Bolan et al, 1997).…”
Section: Bgpr Dissolution and Soil P Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As S oxidising bacteria are widely found in Australian soils (Vitolins and Swaby 1969) the poor efficacy of Biosuper in southern Australia may have resulted from climatic limitations, low reaction of the PR used in the blend, or the large particle size: smaller particle sizes of both RPR (Kittams and Attoe 1965;Kanabo and Gilkes 1988;Watkinson 1994) and S (Attoe and Olsen 1966;Germida and Janzen 1993) favour their chemical reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PR from Gafsa used in this work is one of the more reactive PR existing in the World (Zapata and Roy 2007); and in some soils it showed to have a same relative agronomic efficiency compared to TSP when both P-sources were used in glasshouse experiments (Truong 2004). The PR used here was powdered before applying to soil and, reducing particle size increases the PR dissolution (Kanabo and Gilkes 1988a). The PR was homogeneously mixed with the soil, and increasing the area contact of PR with soil enhanced PR dissolution (Kanabo and Gilkes 1988b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies suggest that PR from North Caroline (USA), Gafsa (Tunisia) and Sechura (Peru) are the more reactive PRs available in the World (Rajan et al 1996;Zapata and Roy 2007). In addition, the finer of the particle size in a given PR, the greater rate of dissolution (Kanabo and Gilkes 1988a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%