2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4918500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of particle size on the rheological properties of polyamide 6/biochar composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4a that the smaller particle diameter of xGnP resulted in a lower value of viscosity. A similar phenomenon was observed for polyamide6/biochar composites [37]. Figure 4b shows the melt viscosity of xGnP-filled nanocomposites increased with increasing xGnP loading attributable to the hindering of the movement of the macromolecular chains of the IMPP by the xGnP particles together with high aspect ratio and the shape of the xGnP platelets favoring the formation of a structural network [36].…”
Section: Thermogravimetric Analysissupporting
confidence: 72%
“…4a that the smaller particle diameter of xGnP resulted in a lower value of viscosity. A similar phenomenon was observed for polyamide6/biochar composites [37]. Figure 4b shows the melt viscosity of xGnP-filled nanocomposites increased with increasing xGnP loading attributable to the hindering of the movement of the macromolecular chains of the IMPP by the xGnP particles together with high aspect ratio and the shape of the xGnP platelets favoring the formation of a structural network [36].…”
Section: Thermogravimetric Analysissupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This can be attributed to a further decrease of pore size and pore volume fraction (Figure ), and to an increase of ζ potential (Figure ) associated with a less hydrated particle surface . The associated changes in PS and PSD are also likely to account for the flow properties . Although the flow curves for CT = 600°C at 25 vol.% solid loading in Figure A exhibit similar, or even slightly higher, levels of apparent viscosity than those with CT = 800‐1000°C at 40 vol.% loading shown in Figure B, and printability is also likely under those conditions, the low solids loading (25 vol.%) of the first case would imply a greater degree of shrinkage upon the drying and sintering steps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Particles of smaller size present greater surface area for the matrix spread and can be seen as one of the primary reasons for improvement in the strength of composites [56,57]. Shape of the particles also plays an imperative role in deciding the mechanical properties of the composite.…”
Section: Fig 4 Variation In Average Impact Strength Of Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%