2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of Parylene coating on the surface roughness of PMMA after brushing

Abstract: Parylene appears to maintain a low surface roughness of PMMA after abrasion by brushing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results demonstrated a decrease in Ra after the coating for almost all the groups. This finding was similar to the results of a previous study 35 with a similar experimental protocol in which lower Ra values were achieved as a result of the coating. Interestingly, the coating of specimens finished with 2400 grit initial finish had no effect on the surface roughness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results demonstrated a decrease in Ra after the coating for almost all the groups. This finding was similar to the results of a previous study 35 with a similar experimental protocol in which lower Ra values were achieved as a result of the coating. Interestingly, the coating of specimens finished with 2400 grit initial finish had no effect on the surface roughness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, as the fitting surface cannot be exposed to finishing treatment and constitutes the main area of bacterial accumulation and growth, Parylene coating can still be beneficial by producing smoother surfaces, which may also be more abrasion-resistant. 35 The use of abrasive paper as the finishing medium allowed for standardization as a polishing machine was used to eliminate the potential errors of manual handling. The mean surface roughness (2.69 μm) achieved by the use of 1000 grit abrasive paper (Group A) represented more closely the expected roughness of a fitting surface of a removable dental prosthesis, which can vary between 3.4 and 7.6 μm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations