2014
DOI: 10.4284/0038-4038-2012.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Peer and Professor Gender on College Student Performance

Abstract: The effects of peer and professor gender on student performance have been examined separately but not in conjunction. We augment previous research by including peer and professor gender, as well as their interaction, in estimations of student performance. After controlling for both student and faculty fixed effects we find that female students typically perform better than males, but this performance gap varies depending on the gender of the professor and of the classroom. Overall the effect of professor gende… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, despite high schools offering little explanatory power over within-university sorting, we document substantial within-university variation in PPI between majors. Majors can affect learning and influence students' academic environments, including interactions with faculty and the development of peer groups (e.g., Artz and Welsch 2014;Carrell, Fullerton, and West 2009;Porter and Umbach 2006;St. John et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, despite high schools offering little explanatory power over within-university sorting, we document substantial within-university variation in PPI between majors. Majors can affect learning and influence students' academic environments, including interactions with faculty and the development of peer groups (e.g., Artz and Welsch 2014;Carrell, Fullerton, and West 2009;Porter and Umbach 2006;St. John et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students' initial placements influence their academic experiences and outcomes (e.g., Artz and Welsch 2014;Carrell, Fullerton, and West 2009;Porter and Umbach 2006;St. John et al 2004).…”
Section: The Mapping Between Initial and Final University-by-majormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that this difference is due to the female gender domination in program delivery. For example, Artz and Welsch (2014) found that gender of the teacher and students influenced students' results and that male and female teachers are more effective when teaching their gender. This finding implies that some elements of the current program implementation could be reconsidered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] Particularly in science and engineering disciplines, same-gender lecturers make students more comfortable in class, which can affect the way students perform in that class. [3] As a result of increased comfort levels, students have a tendency to view same-gender lecturers as role models. [1] [4] Conversely, it has been shown that female students are deterred from continuing their studies when they do not have a female lecturer in their introductory college years to act as a role model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there are significantly fewer female students than male students in STEM majors, female students have less opportunity to work with a variety of their peers and improve their overall course performance. [3] For STEM students, particularly female students, self-efficacy -defined as a student's belief in his or her own ability to achieve academic success -is one of the greatest predictors of success in academic coursework. Female students, in general, rate themselves with lower self-efficacy in engineering coursework, even when they are, in actuality, achieving the same or better grades than their male counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%