2023
DOI: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c00565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Pendent Groups upon Flexibility in Coordination Networks with Square Lattice Topology

Xia Li,
Debobroto Sensharma,
Kyriaki Koupepidou
et al.

Abstract: Gas or vapor-induced phase transformations in flexible coordination networks (CNs) offer the potential to exceed the performance of their rigid counterparts for separation and storage applications. However, whereas ligand modification has been used to alter the properties of such stimulus-responsive materials, they remain understudied compared with their rigid counterparts. Here, we report that a family of Zn 2+ CNs with square lattice ( sql ) topology, differing o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the many ways to classify MOFs, one is by their structural flexibility, with relatively rigid MOFs representing a large group and flexible or dynamic-porous MOFs comprising a much smaller group. , Here, flexibility refers to the dynamic responses of MOF structures to stimuli such as changes in temperature, pressure, , light, and electrical fields or, most commonly, during host–guest interactions . Interestingly, MOFs respond to stimuli through diverse mechanical mechanisms such as breathing, swelling, linker rotation, or subnetwork displacement, , all of which involve deformation of their pores and appear, on isotherms, as peculiar singularities .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the many ways to classify MOFs, one is by their structural flexibility, with relatively rigid MOFs representing a large group and flexible or dynamic-porous MOFs comprising a much smaller group. , Here, flexibility refers to the dynamic responses of MOF structures to stimuli such as changes in temperature, pressure, , light, and electrical fields or, most commonly, during host–guest interactions . Interestingly, MOFs respond to stimuli through diverse mechanical mechanisms such as breathing, swelling, linker rotation, or subnetwork displacement, , all of which involve deformation of their pores and appear, on isotherms, as peculiar singularities .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%