2019 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - EMC EUROPE 2019
DOI: 10.1109/emceurope.2019.8871515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Peripheral Equipment Loading on Reverberation-Chamber Metrics

Abstract: DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to measurements in reverberation chambers that operate in a lower frequency range, the chamber decay time, Q TD and Q FD of unloaded mm-wave RCs are significantly lower, as was also the case in [1]- [3], [6] (Q FD is lower than Q TD since it includes antenna losses). This means that a signal transmitted in a mm-wave chamber such as the one used in this work still reaches the noise floor over three times faster than the chambers used in [4]. This may be due to leakage or increased material losses, however, note that the latter is partially compensated for by reducing the size of the chamber.…”
Section: Time Constantmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to measurements in reverberation chambers that operate in a lower frequency range, the chamber decay time, Q TD and Q FD of unloaded mm-wave RCs are significantly lower, as was also the case in [1]- [3], [6] (Q FD is lower than Q TD since it includes antenna losses). This means that a signal transmitted in a mm-wave chamber such as the one used in this work still reaches the noise floor over three times faster than the chambers used in [4]. This may be due to leakage or increased material losses, however, note that the latter is partially compensated for by reducing the size of the chamber.…”
Section: Time Constantmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The chamber-decay time or time constant, τ RC , is defined by the slope of the exponentially decaying part of the power delay profile (PDP), which is defined by the inverse Fourier transform of an S 21 measurement [4]. In this work, we estimated the time constant in a V = 0.2311 m 3 reverberation chamber with two stirrers, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Time Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation