1977
DOI: 10.1016/0003-9861(77)90268-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of pH and temperature on the kinetics of native and altered glycogen phosphorylase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in the profiles also are not due to a perturbation of the buffer pH by the solvent because, as is seen in Figure 3C, the same shift in the acidic limb is seen in Tris-imidazole buffer. Clearly, the changes seen here are due to a perturbation of some group on the enzyme that is important for the catalytic reaction rather than the binding of the substrates or activators because all effectors used here should be saturating according to the results reported by Kasvinsky & Meyer (1977) and Hollo et al (1966). Figure 4A shows the effect of 1,2-dimethoxyethane on the inhibition by 1,5-gluconolactone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The differences in the profiles also are not due to a perturbation of the buffer pH by the solvent because, as is seen in Figure 3C, the same shift in the acidic limb is seen in Tris-imidazole buffer. Clearly, the changes seen here are due to a perturbation of some group on the enzyme that is important for the catalytic reaction rather than the binding of the substrates or activators because all effectors used here should be saturating according to the results reported by Kasvinsky & Meyer (1977) and Hollo et al (1966). Figure 4A shows the effect of 1,2-dimethoxyethane on the inhibition by 1,5-gluconolactone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…1 (36). This work also showed that the dianion of inorganic phosphate is the true substrate and that a histidine residue would account for the alkaline limb of the activity vs pH profiles with a pK2 of 7.1.…”
Section: Chemical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Values with different superscripts are significantly different (P Ͻ 0.05). chemical form of P i from the monoprotonated form, which is the active substrate for Phos a , to the diprotonated form, which does not act as a substrate for Phos a (12). Changes in muscle NH 3 suggest that at Ͼ10 s of exercise IMP was accumulating from the deamination of AMP, which is also thought to allosterically stimulate Phos a (3).…”
Section: Regulation Of Fuel Selection In White Musclementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The transformation between Phos b and Phos a is regulated at the contractile level through Ca 2ϩ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Decreases in intracellular pH (pH i ) affect the transformation of Phos by inhibiting Phos kinase (4) and affect substrate availability by shifting the speciation of P i (12). To our knowledge, the transformation of Phos has not been examined in trout white muscle during high-intensity exercise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%