2006
DOI: 10.1080/14417040600970622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of phonotactic constraints in German-speaking children with delayed phonological acquisition: Evidence from production of word-initial consonant clusters

Abstract: U n i v e r s i t ä t P o t s d a mHumanwissenschaftliche Fakultät fi rst published in: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology -8 (2006) In this study the effect of phonotactic constraints concerning word-initial consonant clusters in children with delayed phonological acquisition was explored. Twelve German-speaking children took part (mean age 5;1). The spontaneous speech of all children was characterized by the regular appearance of the error patterns fronting, e.g., Kuh ''cow'' /ku:/ ! [tu:], o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a greater performance gap between TD and SLI is expected for both monolingual and bilingual children on NWRT_LD, which contains trilateral sCC onset clusters, where /s/ and /ʃ/ represent an appendix to the prosodic word. The latter has been shown to be deficient in phonologically impaired monolingual German children (Ott et al, 2006). An overview of segments and syllable types is given in Table 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, a greater performance gap between TD and SLI is expected for both monolingual and bilingual children on NWRT_LD, which contains trilateral sCC onset clusters, where /s/ and /ʃ/ represent an appendix to the prosodic word. The latter has been shown to be deficient in phonologically impaired monolingual German children (Ott et al, 2006). An overview of segments and syllable types is given in Table 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the CL-NWRT, e.g., the Dutch Quasi-Universal NWRT (Boerma et al, 2015; Boerma and Blom, 2017), which primarily tests phonological short-term memory and comprises phonologically simple non-words compatible with the phonological properties of any language, the German LITMUS-NWRT was devised to tap more directly into phonological abilities by focusing on phonological complexity. The latter was found to be a promising marker for assessing phonological impairment (Marshall et al, 2002; Ferré et al, 2012; for German, see Ott et al, 2006). LITMUS-NWRTs of this type systematically vary segmental (articulatory difficulty), syllabic (presence or absence of clusters) and sequential complexity (types of consonant and syllable sequences) combining them into non-words of increasing phonological complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%