1975
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1975.tb01951.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Phosphate Applications on the Diffusion Coefficients and Available Phosphate in an Acid Soil

Abstract: The apparent bulk phosphate self-diffusion coefficient, resin extractable and isotopically exchangeable phosphate were measured on an acid Cecil sandy loam soil pre-treated with calcium carbonate and monocalcium phosphate. Apparent diffusion coefficients increased four-fold with a five-fold increase in phosphate addition, but were not increased by liming. Resin extractable phosphate was greater than isotopically exchangeable after large phosphate additions. Calculated porous self-diffusion coefficients did not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best simulation was obtained with a P diffusion coefficient of 0.0025 cm 2 h -1 , which is equivalent to 6.94 × 10 -7 cm 2 s -1 . This is much lower than the diffusion coefficient of P in water, mainly because of the tortuosity of the diffusion path, but higher than the apparent diffusion coefficients of P estimated in literature for most soils (Kunishi and Taylor 1975;Eghball et al 1990;Bhadoria et al 1991;Villani et al 1998). This is mainly because the diffusion coefficient in this model does not reflect the retardation due to precipitation and adsorption reactions, since the effects of such reactions are explicitly accounted for in the model.…”
Section: Model Simulation Of Cation and Anion Profilesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The best simulation was obtained with a P diffusion coefficient of 0.0025 cm 2 h -1 , which is equivalent to 6.94 × 10 -7 cm 2 s -1 . This is much lower than the diffusion coefficient of P in water, mainly because of the tortuosity of the diffusion path, but higher than the apparent diffusion coefficients of P estimated in literature for most soils (Kunishi and Taylor 1975;Eghball et al 1990;Bhadoria et al 1991;Villani et al 1998). This is mainly because the diffusion coefficient in this model does not reflect the retardation due to precipitation and adsorption reactions, since the effects of such reactions are explicitly accounted for in the model.…”
Section: Model Simulation Of Cation and Anion Profilesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…It is obvious, however, that a relatively low surface layer is able to supply the runoff or flood water with P, because the diffusion of P in soil is very slow (LEWIS andQUIRK 1967, KUNISHI andTAYLOR 1975).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant-available or 'labile' soil P was measured in terms of that extractable by anionic resin (Kunishi and Taylor, 1975). A 0.75 g soil sample (<60 mesh) was suspended in 10-ml water with 3.0g Dowex 21K (20-50 mesh, chloride form) anion exchange resin and gently stirred for 16 h. The resin was separated with a 60-mesh sieve, transferred to a 50-ml burette, and eluted with 5 0 m l of 0.25 M Na2SO4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%