1942
DOI: 10.1007/bf02982749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of polyploidy and hybridity on seed size in crosses betweenBrassica chinensis, B. carinata, amphidiploidB. chinensis-carinata and auto-tetraploidB. chinensis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1947
1947
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that results from FISH in combination with molecular karyotyping were highly effective for determining detailed chromosome complements in cytogenetically complex hybrids, as has also been demonstrated in oats (Jellen et al 1994), banana, andsugarcane (D'Hont 2005). This analysis highlighted the dangers of using simple chromosome counts to assess meiotic stability of Brassica allohexaploids, as has been done in other studies (e.g., Howard 1942;Tian et al 2010). In the future, molecular karyotyping with molecular cytogenetics may allow identification of genotypic and species-specific variability for meiotic stability in higher-ploidy Brassica.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that results from FISH in combination with molecular karyotyping were highly effective for determining detailed chromosome complements in cytogenetically complex hybrids, as has also been demonstrated in oats (Jellen et al 1994), banana, andsugarcane (D'Hont 2005). This analysis highlighted the dangers of using simple chromosome counts to assess meiotic stability of Brassica allohexaploids, as has been done in other studies (e.g., Howard 1942;Tian et al 2010). In the future, molecular karyotyping with molecular cytogenetics may allow identification of genotypic and species-specific variability for meiotic stability in higher-ploidy Brassica.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, mixed results have been reported for success of these synthetic allohexaploid Brassica. Howard (1942) reported relatively high fertility over several generations of self-pollination of 2n = AABBCC plants derived from the cross B. rapa 3 B. carinata. However, Iwasa (1964) found poor meiotic stability in the same species cross that failed to improve even up to the F 5 selfing generation, resulting in loss of fertility and hence usefulness of this crop.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that the difference between the cross and its reciprocal is mainly shown in a difference in development of endosperm, which is different in constitution in the two cases; and he also emphasizes that this type of result is not necessarily correlated with a difference in chromosome number between the species concerned. Howard (1942), in analysing the seeds of crosses between a number of diploid, autotetraploid and allotetraploid species of Brassica, finds that in most cases the results follow Watkins's rule (quoted above), but suggests that some allotetraploid species may have evolved so as to have a 'diploid physiology', i.e. they will produce normal seeds when crossed in either direction with a diploid species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The A, B and C genomes are able to co-exist in allopolyploids, as demonstrated by regular diploid behaviour in the three allotetraploid species with 2n = AABB, AACC and BBCC. Contrary to the initial doubt that an allohexaploid Brassica could establish and maintain meiotic stability (Howard 1942;Iwasa 1964), recent evidence suggests that regular diploid behaviour in meiosis can be selected during generations of selfing in allohexaploid Brassica hybrids (Tian et al 2010). Regular diploid behaviour can also be selected in progeny of resynthesised allotetraploids B. juncea, B. napus and B. carinata which are unstable in the original hybrids (Prakash et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%