1989
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690351105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of pore structure on the char‐steam reaction

Abstract: The kinetics of the char-steam gasification reaction and the accompanying pore structure changes have been investigated experimentally and interpreted through the use of the random pore model of Bhatia and Perlmutter (1980) and its extensions developed in this study. To allow model evaluations, surface areas and pore-size distributions were obtained for various partially-reacted char samples. Surface areas follow the reaction rates as a function of conversion, supporting the interpretation that the reaction … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Under these conditions structural effects will dominate. This is indeed supported by the observations of surface area and rate maximima at about the same conversion in several cases (Su and Perlmutter, 1985;Chi and Perlmutter, 1989). Consequently, in the present work wc have focused on the structural issues, with the addition of chemisorption and surface dynamics to be considered subsequently.…”
Section: Aiche Journalsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under these conditions structural effects will dominate. This is indeed supported by the observations of surface area and rate maximima at about the same conversion in several cases (Su and Perlmutter, 1985;Chi and Perlmutter, 1989). Consequently, in the present work wc have focused on the structural issues, with the addition of chemisorption and surface dynamics to be considered subsequently.…”
Section: Aiche Journalsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Models considering internal reaction include the volume and grain reaction models (Szekely et al, 19761, and those that focus on the pore struc-ture (Petersen, 1957;Bhatia and Perlmutter, 1980;Gavalas, 1980). The volume and grain reaction models have the deficiency that they cannot predict a rate maximum with increase in conversion in the chemically controlled regime, a5 is commonly observed (Su and Perlmutter, 1985;Chi and Perlmutter, 1989). This feature can be predicted by the random pore models (Petersen, 1957;Bhatia and Perlmutter, 1980;Gavalas, 1980), which consider the competing mechanisms of pore growth and overlap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As the particle and char reaction processes, the relationship between the internal surface area and porosity of the char can be given by [25] …”
Section: B Modified Quantize Model Constructedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the symmetry of normal distribution L(r) and the pore characteristics of solid [26,27], the structure parameter may be expressed as:…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Structure Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%