2019
DOI: 10.1007/s42242-019-00054-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of porosity on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) bioscaffold

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mechanical properties are critical evaluation indices for the structure used in orthopedic implants (Wang et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2018;Cai et al, 2019). The porous structure of the implant can produce a good biological reaction with the host bone in vivo and solve the problem of stress shielding only when its mechanical properties meet certain conditions.…”
Section: Analysis Of Compression Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical properties are critical evaluation indices for the structure used in orthopedic implants (Wang et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2018;Cai et al, 2019). The porous structure of the implant can produce a good biological reaction with the host bone in vivo and solve the problem of stress shielding only when its mechanical properties meet certain conditions.…”
Section: Analysis Of Compression Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gibson-Ashby power law, commonly used as an empirical model for describing the relationship between modulus and density of lattice structures, is employed to study the effects of relative density. [33][34][35][36] The power law is expressed as E ¼ C r n where C and n are coefficients depending on the lattice types and our results are fitted to the expression under fixed C = 1 to satisfy % E = 1 when r = 1, i.e., only one fitting parameter n is used. From our simulation results, the maximum Young's modulus curve is obtained which is found to be accurate in the entire range of the relative density.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results illustrated that Gyroid skeletal-TPMS had the most flexible design space, that is, it performed well in three aspects (Barba et al, 2019). However, the compressive strength of sheet-TPMS was 1.3-2 times that of skeleton TPMS, and its toughness was also higher (Cai et al, 2019).…”
Section: Tpmsmentioning
confidence: 93%