2014
DOI: 10.5539/ijel.v4n6p124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Positive Evidence and Negative Feedback on EFL Learners’ Acquisition of the Third Person Singular Form

Abstract: The study compared the relative effectiveness of two types of input situated in written context -positive evidence and negative feedback-on Chinese lower intermediate EFL learners' acquisition of the third person singular form. Using a pretest-posttest and control group experimental design, the effect of these two types of input was measured by an error correction test and a speeded dictation test. In addition, a retrospective interview conducted at the end of the study provided information about the use that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Valero, Fernández, Iseni, and Clarkson, 2008;Rezaei, Mozaffari, and Hatef, 2011;and Amara, 2015) have argued that when a teacher ignores her student's errors in using the target language, over time, those errors become fossilised. Likewise, oral corrective feedback allows the students to notice the gap between the target language utterances they produce and how they should produce them (Rezaei et al, 2011;Jiang & Yi, 2014). Thus, oral corrective feedback can promote the language development of the student.…”
Section: Pros and Cons Of Providing Oral Corrective Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Valero, Fernández, Iseni, and Clarkson, 2008;Rezaei, Mozaffari, and Hatef, 2011;and Amara, 2015) have argued that when a teacher ignores her student's errors in using the target language, over time, those errors become fossilised. Likewise, oral corrective feedback allows the students to notice the gap between the target language utterances they produce and how they should produce them (Rezaei et al, 2011;Jiang & Yi, 2014). Thus, oral corrective feedback can promote the language development of the student.…”
Section: Pros and Cons Of Providing Oral Corrective Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When learners make the same subject predicate mistake for the first time, teachers should correct it in time to avoid forming the wrong habit. Among high school and College English learners as a second language, basic errors in pronunciation and grammar are common, which also reflects the lack of timeliness of teaching feedback [8][9][10].…”
Section: Pay Attention To the Error Correction Timeliness In The Earl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the two important remaining questions are as follows: What is the appropriate amount of each type of evidence required for L2 acquisition, and which type plays a more significant role in ultimate L2 attainment? Jiang and Yi (2014) pointed out that both positive and negative evidence are equally fundamental for L2 acquisition. Yet, more investigation is needed to ascertain the validity of this assumption.…”
Section: Linguistics Evidence In Slamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative evidence involves providing language learners with explicit grammar instruction and examples of ungrammatical sentences. The majority of EFL teachers agree on the importance and the effectiveness of using both positive and negative evidence in EFL classrooms (Strapp et al, 2011;Jiang and Yi, 2014). However, disagreement persists regarding what type of evidence should be emphasized as the major input in L2 classrooms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%