2017
DOI: 10.1177/0023830917708808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Practice and Visual Feedback on Oral-Diadochokinetic Rates for Younger and Older Adults

Abstract: Assessments of oral-diadochokinetic rates are commonly performed to evaluate oral-motor skills. However, the appropriate administration protocol is not defined, and varies across therapists, clinics and laboratories. In three experiments and an auxiliary one, this study analyzes the effects of brief (motor) practice and visual feedback on the performance of 98 younger (20-40 years old) and 78 older adults (over 65) with the sequential motion rate (SMR) version. Overall rates were significantly faster for young… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it is time and cost-efficient, non-invasive, and simple to administer. Second, because the task requires only the repetition of short syllables, it can be administered to individuals within a wide age range (26), linguistic backgrounds, speech severities (7), and cognitive and linguistic impairments (8, 9). Third, widely-published normative data for AMR tasks across the life-span provide a rich empirical basis for identifying impaired oromotor function (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, it is time and cost-efficient, non-invasive, and simple to administer. Second, because the task requires only the repetition of short syllables, it can be administered to individuals within a wide age range (26), linguistic backgrounds, speech severities (7), and cognitive and linguistic impairments (8, 9). Third, widely-published normative data for AMR tasks across the life-span provide a rich empirical basis for identifying impaired oromotor function (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maximize the diagnostic efficacy of the assessment, research is needed to understand and subsequently minimize sources of variability related to test administration procedures and participant factors. Although not well-understood, performance on an AMR task can be influenced by a number of factors including familiarity, pre-test practice, instructions, motivation, feedback, age, and sex (2, 3, 10, 21). Perhaps equally concerning is the questionable validity of the task as a maximum performance test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, May 2021 https://doi.org/10.37341/jkf.v0i0.263 mouth posture (Hale et al, 1992). Oral motor ability balance is the key to fluent speech production (Ben-David & Icht, 2018;Lowit et al, 2018;Pratomo & Siswanto, 2020;Redstone & KowalskI, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ability is divided into Sequencing Motion Rate and Alternating Motion Rate (AMR). This ability indicates speaking planning and programming process (Ben-David & Icht, 2018;Duffy, 2013;Lowit et al, 2018;Padovani et al, 2009). The failure in doing DDK task informs the putative speaking problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As age increased, the individuals showed significant changes in several biomechanical features of the stomatognathic system (for a detailed review, please see Avivi-Arber and Sessle, 2018). In general, these changes included a decrease in the maximal bite force (Ikebe et al, 2005), the maximum tongue pressure (Utanohara et al, 2008), and the rate of oral diadochokinesis (Ben-David and Icht, 2018). Similar to the age-related changes in the brain, the changes in oral functions are also coupled with structural alterations.…”
Section: Age-related Changes In the Stomatognathic System: A View Fromentioning
confidence: 99%