Purpose
For wheelchair-users with a spinal cord injury, the lower body may be a more convenient cooling site than the upper body. However, it remains unknown if leg cooling reduces thermal strain in these individuals. We compared the impact of upper-body versus lower-body cooling on physiological and perceptual outcomes during submaximal arm-crank exercise under heat stress in individuals with paraplegia.
Methods
Twelve male participants with paraplegia (T4-L2, 50% complete lesion) performed a maximal exercise test in temperate conditions, and three heat stress tests (32 °C, 40% relative humidity) in which they received upper-body cooling (COOL-UB), lower-body cooling (COOL-LB) or no cooling (CON) in randomized counterbalanced order. Each heat stress test consisted of 4 exercise blocks of 15 min at 50% of peak power output, with 3 min of rest in between. Cooling was applied using water-perfused pads, with 14.8 m tubing in both COOL-UB and COOL-LB.
Results
Gastrointestinal temperature was 0.2 °C (95%CI: 0.1, 0.3 °C) lower during exercise in COOL-UB versus CON (37.5 ± 0.4 vs. 37.7 ± 0.3 °C, p = 0.009), with no difference between COOL-LB and CON (p = 1.0). Heart rate was lower in both COOL-UB (-7 bpm, 95%CI: -11, -3 bpm, p = 0.01) and COOL-LB (-5 bpm, 95%CI: -9, -1 bpm, p = 0.049) compared to CON. The skin temperature reduction at the cooled skin sites was larger in COOL-LB (-10.8 ± 1.1 °C) than in COOL-UB (-6.7 ± 1.4 °C, p < 0.001), which limited the cooling capacity in COOL-LB. Thermal sensation of the cooled skin sites was improved and overall thermal discomfort was lower in COOL-UB (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04) but not COOL-LB (p = 0.17 and p = 0.59) compared to CON.
Conclusions
Upper-body cooling more effectively reduced thermal strain than lower-body cooling in individuals with paraplegia, as it induced greater thermophysiological and perceptual benefits.