1993
DOI: 10.1080/00224545.1993.9713920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Prejudice and Judicial Ambiguity on Defendant Guilt Ratings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of racial stereotypes cannot be overlooked, as jurors may rely on heuristics or stereotypes, as opposed to systematic and rationale cognitive processing, when making complex judgments regarding probative evidence (Bornstein & Greene, 2011). Indeed, in the absence of physical evidence, or when tasked with complex decision-making tasks, racial stereotypes regarding the defendants' or victims' characteristics may significantly influence their decisions (Bottoms et al, 2004;Lynch & Haney, 2000;Rector, Bagby, & Nicholson, 1993).…”
Section: Medical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of racial stereotypes cannot be overlooked, as jurors may rely on heuristics or stereotypes, as opposed to systematic and rationale cognitive processing, when making complex judgments regarding probative evidence (Bornstein & Greene, 2011). Indeed, in the absence of physical evidence, or when tasked with complex decision-making tasks, racial stereotypes regarding the defendants' or victims' characteristics may significantly influence their decisions (Bottoms et al, 2004;Lynch & Haney, 2000;Rector, Bagby, & Nicholson, 1993).…”
Section: Medical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not as significant as physical attractiveness, race also has been shown to affect perceptions of the accused (Rector & Bagby, 1993;Foley, Adams & Goodson, 1996;Reynolds, 1996). One of the most researched areas is the effect of race on juror decisions.…”
Section: Physical Attractwenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pfeifer & Ogloff (1991) have argued convincingly that the failure to include judicial instructions to the jury has limited the degree to which the simulation model reflects actual legal decision making. Both Pfeiffer & Ogloff (1991) and Rector and colleagues (Rector et al, 1993) have shown that, in the American context, White prejudicial bias towards African Americans is reduced when the legal instructions are included. Hence, the application of the legal standard in simulated jury research has been shown to influence the perception of the defendant and victim, and subsequent verdict and sentence ratings in such a way that when the context is less ambiguous, ratings are more equivocal.…”
Section: And R Michael Bagbymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have shown repeatedly that, in rape and murder cases White mock jurors find the defendant guilty more frequently when he is Black than when the defendant is White, and this racial bias is especially prominent when the victim is White (Bullock, 1961;Klein & Creech, 1982;Radelet & Pierce, 1985;Ugweuegbu, 1979). Racial discrimination in guilt determinations continues to be observed in the US (Rector, Bagby & Nicholson, 1993) and a recent meta-analytic review of the extant literature shows that African American males continue to receive discriminatory sentences (Sweeney & Haney, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation