2017
DOI: 10.1080/1331677x.2017.1305802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of presidential election in the USA on stock return flow – a study of a political event

Abstract: The subject of this paper is to determine the statistical significance of abnormal return that appeared on the New York Stock Exchange after the presidential election in the USA in November 2012. The analysis is focused on securities of the financial institutions listed on the New York Stock Exchange, whereby 85 companies have been included. For the purposes of the analysis a standard methodology of event study has been used. In general, parametric tests show a statistically significant negative impact of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of them are non-significant and some are positive. Obradović and Tomić (2017) 85 companies (banks, investment banks, and insurance companies) whose securities are listed on the NYSE. In this study, they covered a six-month period for the estimation part, which started on May 6, 2012.…”
Section: Miletić (2011) Investigated the Connection Between Dividend mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them are non-significant and some are positive. Obradović and Tomić (2017) 85 companies (banks, investment banks, and insurance companies) whose securities are listed on the NYSE. In this study, they covered a six-month period for the estimation part, which started on May 6, 2012.…”
Section: Miletić (2011) Investigated the Connection Between Dividend mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies, for example, Lumjiak, Treepongkaruna, Wee, and Brooks (2016), have checked for equal abnormal performance before and after the event day. Inequality may be interpreted as indicating structural changes (Lumjiak et al, 2016) or information dissemination (Obradovic & Tomic, 2017). This study tests the equality hypothesis.…”
Section: Model Estimation and Hypothesis Testsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Event study analyses are a popular approach to test these effects. For example, for developed markets, Niederhoffer, Gibbs, and Bullock (1970), Oehler, Walker, and Wendt (2013), and Obradovic and Tomic (2017) conducted studies in the U.S.A., while Leblang and Mukherjee (2005) studied both the U.S.A. and the U.K. For emerging markets, studies were conducted for Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, and Taiwan by Imelda, Siregar, and Anggraeni (2014), Redzwan, Musa, Latip, Latif, and Rahman (2019), Khan, Jafri, Baig, Shaique, and Usman (2017), and Hung (2011), respectively. Moreover, Nimkhunthod (2007) performed a study on the Thai market, and Wong and Hooy (2016) studied the Indonesian, Malaysian, and Thai markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Informasi ekonomi dapat berupa perubahan manajemen, penerbitan saham baru, merger, pengungkapan laporan keuangan, akuisisi atau kebangkrutan. Peristiwa non-ekonomi biasanya terjadi karena faktor politik atau geostrategis (Obradovic & Tomic, 2017) dan (Sajid Nazir, Younus, Kaleem, & Anwar, 2014). Peristiwa politik maupun tindakan pemerintah memiliki potensi untuk mempengaruhi fluktuasi pasar modal, yang nantinya akan menentukan kesejahteraan keuangan masyarakat di suatu negara (Wisniewski, 2016).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified