1980
DOI: 10.1016/0309-1740(80)90021-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of pressurisation of pre-rigor muscle on post-rigor meat characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
4
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
30
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Pressure treatments have been reported to accelerate meat tenderness and to enhance the eating quality (20,21). This seems in conflict with the observation in this study.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pressure treatments have been reported to accelerate meat tenderness and to enhance the eating quality (20,21). This seems in conflict with the observation in this study.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Pressure treatment has been shown to accelerate meat tenderness and enhance its eating quality (20,21). Using histological studies, Martino et al (5) showed that PSF (200 MPa, -20°C) treated pork samples had less structural damage than air blast and cryogenic fluid frozen samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previous studies demonstrated the possibility of accelerating tenderization during maturation by initially applying pressure treatment due to changes in the myofibrils structure caused by HPP (Kennick et al 1980;Riffero and Holmes 1983;Locker and Wild 1984;Suzuki et al 1990;Cheftel and Curioli 1997). Solomon et al (2006) and Bowker et al (2007Bowker et al ( , 2008, using the meat of Brahman (B. indicus) cattle, observed that the hydrodynamic pressure processing (HDP), used in short application periods as shock waves, proved to be very effective in improving tenderness in some cuts of meat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Values for breakdown following two chews did not differ between the two formulations and are not given in tabular form. Flaked and formed steaks processed from pre-rigor pressurized beef had more visual micro distortion, less springiness after being partially compressed, less first bite uniformity and moisture release, lower juiciness values and greater amounts of gristle and webbed tissue than flaked and formed steaks processed from post-rigor, vantages previously noted for intact muscle cuts from pre-rigor pressurized beef (Macfarlane, 1973;Kennick et al, 1980;Riffero and Holmes, 1983) were partially characteristic of flaked and formed steaks. Seideman et al (1982) found lower tenderness scores for restructured steaks processed from pre-rigor (nonpressurized) beef that was frozen prior to restructuring compared to post-rigor beef frozen prior to restructuring.…”
Section: Cookingmentioning
confidence: 82%