2003
DOI: 10.1080/10696679.2003.11501934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Price Presentation Tactics on Consumer Evaluation Effort of Multi-Dimensional Prices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
1
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
51
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, how the same information facilitates people's processing influences their decision making (Darke & Chung, 2005;Heath et al, 1995). For example, it is more difficult to process information presented in proportions than in raw units (Estelami, 2003). When a piece of information is difficult to process, people tend to ignore it and selectively attend to other information that is easier to process (Oberauer, 2003) because, due to their limited working memory capacity, they must control what they attend to in decision making (Kane & Engle, 2003).…”
Section: Visual Saliencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, how the same information facilitates people's processing influences their decision making (Darke & Chung, 2005;Heath et al, 1995). For example, it is more difficult to process information presented in proportions than in raw units (Estelami, 2003). When a piece of information is difficult to process, people tend to ignore it and selectively attend to other information that is easier to process (Oberauer, 2003) because, due to their limited working memory capacity, they must control what they attend to in decision making (Kane & Engle, 2003).…”
Section: Visual Saliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study 1 investigates the interactive role of visual salience and the level of difficulty involved in processing information on people's responses to integrated and segregated payments (Estelami, 2003;Jarvenpaa, 1990). Study 2 further demonstrates the way in which stimulus-versus recall-driven perceptions determine whether people integrate multiple losses (Bettman, Johnson, & Payne, 1992;Hastie & Park, 1986;Lynch & Srull, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To augment Garbarino [47] and Xia [48] claimed that consumers who wish dollar off and cash coupon, have lesser perceived price unfairness, more perceived value, trust, and have more re-purchase intentions than their corresponding item. Other than that, [49] also gave clear suggestion that price can makes difference in intentions and revealed that if price hits ethical norms, trust will be lost and negative intention increases.…”
Section: Price Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence to suggest that such discriminations in discount features would be difficult for most individuals to make. Consumers have difficulty in processing price information (e.g., Estelami, 2003;Kruger & Vargas, 2008), and people, more generally, have difficulty appreciating the notion and implications of regression to the mean (e.g., Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). Moreover, those who preferred per-item and per-purchase discounts in Study 2 did not differ in the importance they assigned to "avoiding the worst possible discount" or "achieving the best possible discount" as reasons for their preference.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 97%