2010
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-221333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of prolonged administration of hydroxyurea on morbidity and mortality in adult patients with sickle cell syndromes: results of a 17-year, single-center trial (LaSHS)

Abstract: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of hydroxyurea (HU) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Thirty-four patients with sickle cell anemia (hemoglobin S [HbS]/HbS), 131 with HbS/␤ 0 -thal, and 165 with HbS/␤ ؉ -thal participated in this trial. HU was administered to 131 patients, whereas 199 patients were conventionally treated. The median follow-up period was 8 years for HU patients and 5 years for non-HU patients. HU produced a dramatic reduction in the f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

16
366
6
10

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 386 publications
(398 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
16
366
6
10
Order By: Relevance
“…There are, to date, no controlled studies that implicate either hydroxyurea or busulfan as being leukemogenic in either ET or PV. Similarly, the two largest non-controlled studies in ET [54] and PV [108] do not support the concern that leukemia might arise from the use of hydroxyurea and there is additional evidence to that effect from long-term studies of patients receiving hydroxyurea for sickle cell disease [123]. The evidence for busulfan leukemogenicity in the context of treatment for PV or ET is equally weak and inappropriately extrapolated from older patients with advanced phase disease and exposed to multiple cytoreductive drugs.…”
Section: Annual Clinical Updates In Hematological Malignanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are, to date, no controlled studies that implicate either hydroxyurea or busulfan as being leukemogenic in either ET or PV. Similarly, the two largest non-controlled studies in ET [54] and PV [108] do not support the concern that leukemia might arise from the use of hydroxyurea and there is additional evidence to that effect from long-term studies of patients receiving hydroxyurea for sickle cell disease [123]. The evidence for busulfan leukemogenicity in the context of treatment for PV or ET is equally weak and inappropriately extrapolated from older patients with advanced phase disease and exposed to multiple cytoreductive drugs.…”
Section: Annual Clinical Updates In Hematological Malignanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This survival benefit was maintained at 17.5 years [58]. Another study replicated the benefit of hydroxyurea therapy on survival in a 17-year, open-label trial of 330 adult patients with SCD [59]. Adults with SCD treated with hydroxyurea therapy had a significant reduction in the frequency of pain episodes, transfusion requirements, hospital admissions, and the incidence of ACS.…”
Section: Hydroxyurea Therapymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Adults with SCD treated with hydroxyurea therapy had a significant reduction in the frequency of pain episodes, transfusion requirements, hospital admissions, and the incidence of ACS. Most importantly, the incidence of stroke (3.8% vs. 5.0%), death from liver dysfunction (0.7% vs. 5%), and overall mortality (86% vs. 65%, P 5 0.001) were also significantly lower in the hydroxyurea group comprised of adults with severe disease, defined as 3 or more painful sickle cell crises during the preceding year that needed hospitalization or emergency room visits; the presence of jaundice at presentation or complications of SCD, such as stroke and acute chest syndrome during the last 5 years, compared with the observation group that had less severe disease [59].…”
Section: Hydroxyurea Therapymentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mechanisms underlying these and other beneficial effects of the drug affecting leukocytes and the endothelium (16)(17)(18) have not been fully elucidated. Nevertheless, the consensus for management of SCD care is administration of HU due to its success in both adult and children populations (19)(20)(21)(22)(23). It must be noted, however, that there are patient populations who are unresponsive to HU treatment (24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%