2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/biorob.2018.8487906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Prolonged Use of a Wearable Soft-Robotic Glove Post Stroke - a Proof-of-Principle

Abstract: Many stroke survivors encounter difficulties in the performance of activities of daily life due to limitations in functional use of the hand. Robotic technology has the potential to compensate for this loss by providing the support that is required to perform activities of daily living, especially when these devices are wearable comfortably for many hours at home. As a first step towards the implementation of assistive technology in the homes of stroke survivors, usability along with the potential effect of pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be related to the fact that the activities were performed with complete flexion and extension movements for every grasp, and the time required for the exoskeleton to perform the extension movement of 2.00 ± 0.35 s and the flexion movement of 3.47 ± 0.30 s, in addition to the deflation time which is about second. This can be seen in the times of the JTHFT subtasks, as the longer times are related to multi-object tasks, as opposed to the Writing subtask and Simulated Feeding subtask, as only one extension and one flexion movement were required to grasp a single object, a pen for the Writing subtask and a piece of cutlery for the Simulated Feeding subtask, which resulted in the shortest times of the ExHand Exoskeleton (times of 25.33 ± 3.18 and 26.26 ± 3.84 s, respectively) and similar to those presented by Van Ommeren et al ( 2018 ) and Tran et al ( 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This could be related to the fact that the activities were performed with complete flexion and extension movements for every grasp, and the time required for the exoskeleton to perform the extension movement of 2.00 ± 0.35 s and the flexion movement of 3.47 ± 0.30 s, in addition to the deflation time which is about second. This can be seen in the times of the JTHFT subtasks, as the longer times are related to multi-object tasks, as opposed to the Writing subtask and Simulated Feeding subtask, as only one extension and one flexion movement were required to grasp a single object, a pen for the Writing subtask and a piece of cutlery for the Simulated Feeding subtask, which resulted in the shortest times of the ExHand Exoskeleton (times of 25.33 ± 3.18 and 26.26 ± 3.84 s, respectively) and similar to those presented by Van Ommeren et al ( 2018 ) and Tran et al ( 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…So far, these attempts focus on direct translation of clinical exercises to the home setting by assisting the exercises to be executed regardless of the location of the patient [17]. All efforts require patients to be proactive and self-motivated and allocate time and space to implement the exercises into their daily lives [24,29,30]. Unfortunately, this requirement is hardly realistic for patients, as they either find the practices time-consuming and nonfitting their daily routines or forget to do the exercises [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could make the SEM Glove™ a suitable solution for stroke survivors that do not show spasticity or contractures but still experience problems with executing grasping movements. Up to now, a comparable, further developed, version of the SEM Glove™ is the only wearable soft-robotic glove that has shown to be feasible when used for four weeks independently during ADL at home by stroke patients [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%