2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08423-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of prophylactic balloon occlusion in patients with placenta accreta spectrum: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using R 4.1 software with gemtc and rjags packages as previously described (10). The network meta-analysis employed OR and 95% credibility intervals (95% CrIs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using R 4.1 software with gemtc and rjags packages as previously described (10). The network meta-analysis employed OR and 95% credibility intervals (95% CrIs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…98,99 A randomized controlled trial of internal iliac artery occlusion balloons reported no improvement in blood loss volume or need for hysterectomy. 100 A meta-analysis suggests that endovascular intervention may result in less blood loss compared with no endovascular intervention, particularly if occlusion is done at the level of the abdominal aorta, 101 but data are largely from uncontrolled studies with highly varied inclusion criteria, indications for use, and techniques for balloon inflation. 102 Ultimately, more prospective research is needed to confirm and define benefits of balloon occlusion.…”
Section: Balloon Occlusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aortic balloon occlusion in PAS has been shown to reduce blood loss, transfusion requirements and increase rates of uterine conservation [ 7 , 16 , 17 ]. In contrast, internal iliac artery occlusion typically requires placement in an interventional radiology suite due to the need for selective arterial catherization and bilateral femoral artery access; it also presents radiation burden to the woman and fetus [ 18 ]; and perhaps most importantly, multiple randomized control trials have shown no benefit in reducing maternal morbidity [ [10] , [11] , [12] ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%