2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.06.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of prospective payment on rehabilitative care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under PPS, SNF patients may be receiving less rehabilitation therapy, 16 and IRF patients may have shorter stays. 17 The current study results may be used as a reference for patient outcomes before the implementation of major Medicare postacute care policy changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under PPS, SNF patients may be receiving less rehabilitation therapy, 16 and IRF patients may have shorter stays. 17 The current study results may be used as a reference for patient outcomes before the implementation of major Medicare postacute care policy changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reimbursements for PAC rehabilitation services had increased rapidly following the 1984 introduction of prospective payment for acute care hospitals and ensuing reductions in inpatient lengths of stay (LOSs). 1 From 1989 to 1996, Medicare home health agency spending rose from $2.8 to $11.3 billion, and average numbers of annual home health care visits per Medicare patient increased from 27 to 72. 2 With escalating costs and concerns about widespread variability in utilization patterns, 3 Congress aimed to control the growth in rehabilitation services provided by home health agencies, skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), and outpatient rehabilitation settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For IRFs, prospective payments are based on a classification into a case-mix group based on the patient's diagnosis, functional level (measured using the FIM instrument) and age. 1 Some adjustments are also made based on patient factors (eg, comorbidities) and institutional factors (eg, urban vs rural settings). In home health agencies, all agencies are required to use a 60-day episode rate as the basic unit of payment with adjustments allowed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible reasons for the increase in cost associated with psychiatric illness include lowered tolerance for aversive post-TBI symptoms such as headache and fatigue (Fann et al, 1995), and cognitive impairment impacting symptom tolerance and problem-solving (Slomine et al, 2002). This information adds to concern that the costs of providing treatment (e.g., inpatient rehabilitation services) are often greater than reimbursement from Medicare's prospective payment system (Dobrez et al, 2004), and are increased when psychiatric illness such as depression is comorbid (Dobrez et al, 2010). Few studies have examined the effectiveness or costs of depression treatment in the setting of TBI (Fann et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%