2006
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200606000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Proteolytic Enzyme Serratiopeptidase in the Treatment of Experimental Implant-Related Infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous in vitro studies performed by our research group showed that serratiopeptidase, a bacterial protease commercially available as an oral anti-inflammatory drug, and favoring the penetration of antibiotics at infected sites, is able to significantly enhance the actrvity of several antibiotics against bacterial biofilms (18). Different in vivo trials also showed the ability of this enzyme to enhance therapeutic outcomes of antibiotic therapy in the treatment of different prosthetic infections (19)(20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous in vitro studies performed by our research group showed that serratiopeptidase, a bacterial protease commercially available as an oral anti-inflammatory drug, and favoring the penetration of antibiotics at infected sites, is able to significantly enhance the actrvity of several antibiotics against bacterial biofilms (18). Different in vivo trials also showed the ability of this enzyme to enhance therapeutic outcomes of antibiotic therapy in the treatment of different prosthetic infections (19)(20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In this complex context, basing on previous data obtained by our research group and showing that serratiopeptidase, a bacterial protease commercially available as an anti-inflammatory oral drug, is able to significantly enhance the activity of several antibiotics against bacterial biofilms (18) and to enhance therapeutic outcomes of antibiotic therapy in the treatment ofdifferent prosthetic infections (19,20), we decided to evaluate the effect of introducing serratiopeptidase in a combined protocol to treat PI (based on surgical debridement and administration of systemic antibiotics). The rationale of this combined treatment protocol relies in the additional capacity of serratiopeptidase to make residual bacterial biofilm that survived mechanical debridement of the implant surface, more susceptible to the action of the antibiotic (18) and in parallel to enhance the penetration of systemically administered antibiotics at the infected site (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of this model of periprosthetic infection lies in bone changes found to be similar to those observed clinically in patients and has been reported in earlier studies from our group 16 and others. 23,24 Thus, there was marked periosteal elevation and reactive bone formation as well as cortical disruption. Remarkably, when the SGV was present in the femoral canal, few, if any, of these radiographic changes were evident.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies investigating the systemic use of serrapeptase have demonstrated no adverse effects 3,5,10,12,13,15,16,18,19,21,23 . In this study the drug was very well tolerated by all patients, and none of them reported any untoward reaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%