1994
DOI: 10.1097/00005053-199406000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Psychopathology on the Ability of Schizophrenic Patients to Give Informed Consent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Early work pointed to the mixed role of psychotic symptoms in decisional impairment. For example, before, during, and after MacArthur, 133,135,149 conceptual disorganization (as measured with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale 150 ) was found to be correlated with impaired understanding of treatment disclosures among schizophrenia patients. In more recent studies using the MacCAT-CR and other measures of decisional abilities, psychotic symptoms have not been as strongly or consistently associated with decisional abilities as cognitive functioning (Table 2).…”
Section: Descriptive Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early work pointed to the mixed role of psychotic symptoms in decisional impairment. For example, before, during, and after MacArthur, 133,135,149 conceptual disorganization (as measured with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale 150 ) was found to be correlated with impaired understanding of treatment disclosures among schizophrenia patients. In more recent studies using the MacCAT-CR and other measures of decisional abilities, psychotic symptoms have not been as strongly or consistently associated with decisional abilities as cognitive functioning (Table 2).…”
Section: Descriptive Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45,130 ) In addition, investigators began to examine consent procedures themselves, suspecting that difficulties with informed consent resided at least partially in those procedures and not just in characteristics or symptoms of the patients. Intriguing results emerged from these early studies, including findings that (1) many consent forms and disclosures were inadequate, but even with improved disclosures, many patients continued to have difficulty understanding research; 129 (2) many participants in research did not understand randomization and double-blind procedures and seemed to believe that the research was conducted for their personal benefit; 129,131,132 (3) cognitive symptoms, conceptual disorganization, and acute psychosis were related to decision-making abilities; [133][134][135][136] and (4) patients with neuropsychiatric disorders showed both heterogeneity, as well as strengths, in informed consent contexts (relating both to research and treatment). [134][135][136][137][138][139] The highly innovative multiyear, multisite MacArthur competency study, which laid much of the groundwork for inquiry into decisional abilities, was the largest systematic study of capacity to consent.…”
Section: Descriptive Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schachter ve arkadaşları, 38 şizofreni hastasın-dan oluşan örneklemde sanrıların, varsanıların ve düşüncelerdeki dağınıklığın onam verme kapasitesini olumsuz etkilediğini görmüşlerdir. [32] Howe ve arkadaşları yatarak tedavi gören 110 (64'ü şizofreni, 25'i şizoaffektif bozukluk, 21'i bipolar bozukluk tanısı almış) katılımcıyı onam verme yeterliliği açısından karşılaştırmışlar ve tanı grupları arasında bir farklılık bulmamışlardır. Özellikle bilişlerle ilgili pozitif belirtiler ve yeterlilik arasında negatif bir ilişki olduğu saptanmıştır.…”
Section: Psikiyatrik Belirtilerunclassified
“…schizophrenia are able to participate in medical decision making, the severity of their symptoms may reduce the ability of some patients to understand the information presented during the informed consent process (5,6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%