2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of quantitative reasoning on prospective mathematics teachers’ proof comprehension: The case of real numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perpendicular and hypotenuse are known, so the Pythagorean theorem can be used to prove it. Some students struggle with mathematical proof due to a lack of knowledge about the definitions of terms and statements and how to use them in proof, a lack of understanding of concepts, and a lack of generating and using students' examples of evidence-based statements (Belin & Akar, 2020;Moore, 1994). The description of the student's answers' results is then coded to identify the achievement of the student's geometric thinking level.…”
Section: Figure 3 Deductive Reasoning Used By M1 Student To Prove Phy...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perpendicular and hypotenuse are known, so the Pythagorean theorem can be used to prove it. Some students struggle with mathematical proof due to a lack of knowledge about the definitions of terms and statements and how to use them in proof, a lack of understanding of concepts, and a lack of generating and using students' examples of evidence-based statements (Belin & Akar, 2020;Moore, 1994). The description of the student's answers' results is then coded to identify the achievement of the student's geometric thinking level.…”
Section: Figure 3 Deductive Reasoning Used By M1 Student To Prove Phy...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When in the role of teachers, the greatest difficulties are related to implementing high-level tasks related to reasoning and demonstration and managing students' pre-existing habits of mind that were not attuned to mathematical sense-making (Stylianides et al, 2013). Belin and Akar (2020) addressed argumentation with real numbers and showed that after instruction where different representations were worked on, prospective teachers generated their own examples and drew diagrams while explaining the statements and notations given in the argumentations, where decimals were used to work with periodic numbers. This type of instruction can overcome epistemological obstacles, as per Bachelard (1938) on the comparison between numbers using different periodic notations (Mena-Lorca et al, 2014).…”
Section: / 18mentioning
confidence: 99%