2008
DOI: 10.1086/529360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Radiation Pressure on Virial Black Hole Mass Estimates and the Case of Narrow‐Line Seyfert 1 Galaxies

Abstract: We consider the effect of radiation pressure from ionizing photons on black hole (BH) mass estimates based on the application of the virial theorem to broad emission lines in AGN spectra. BH masses based only on the virial product ∆V 2 R and neglecting the effect of radiation pressure can be severely underestimated especially in objects close to the Eddington limit. We provide an empirical calibration of the correction for radiation pressure and we show that it is consistent with a simple physical model in whi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
349
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(368 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
16
349
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Masses estimated from line widths assume the BLR clouds are virialized. However, the effective gravity experienced by the clouds will be reduced due to radiation pressure from the central source, leading to an underestimate for masses of NLS1s (Marconi et al 2008). Inclination is also another uncertainty, as the BLR velocity field is not completely virialized, but contains a clear equatorial component (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masses estimated from line widths assume the BLR clouds are virialized. However, the effective gravity experienced by the clouds will be reduced due to radiation pressure from the central source, leading to an underestimate for masses of NLS1s (Marconi et al 2008). Inclination is also another uncertainty, as the BLR velocity field is not completely virialized, but contains a clear equatorial component (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shen et al 2011), due to the systematics involved in the calibration and usage (e.g. Marconi et al 2008;Kelly et al 2009). We assume that there is no significant evolution of the MBH-M bulge relation at z ≈ 1 from the local relation and thus use MBH ∼ 0.0014M bulge .…”
Section: Stellar and Black Hole Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of reverberation mapping, the photoionized BLR gas is deep within the potential well of the black hole where its motion is expected to be dominated by gravity in the absence of strong radiation pressure. While the effect of radiation pressure is still debatable for lines such as C IV, these conditions are most likely to be satisfied for Hβ (e.g., Marconi et al 2008;Netzer 2009;Netzer & Marziani 2010) which is expected to arise from gas that is well-shielded from the central ionizing source. The Dopplerbroadened width of the Hβ emission line is therefore a measure of the line-of-sight velocity of the gas within the BLR.…”
Section: Black Hole Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%