The Effect of Raffle Odds on Signing In at a Treatment Center for Adults with Mental Illness

Gravina, Nicole; Wilder, David A.; White, Holly; Fabian, Todd

doi:10.1300/j075v24n04_02

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One such study reported no differences in attendance rate across 3 different conditions (25%, 50%, and 75%) among patients with mental disorders. 36 Although rare, some studies have compared the effectiveness of the lottery incentive while manipulating both the amount of the prize and the chance of winning. For example, 1 study randomly assigned 209 adults to 1 of 4 groups (a group with a 25% chance of receiving $5; a group with a 25% chance of receiving $500; a group with an 18% chance of receiving $5 but also a 1% chance of receiving $50; and a control group receiving text feedback) to compare the effectiveness of the incentives in enhancing physical activity.…”

Section: What Are Your Research’s Implications Towards Theory Practic...mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Pilot Study for Testing the Effectiveness and Cost-Efficiency of Lottery Incentive in mHealth App that Promotes Walking

Lee

Chung

2022

INQUIRY

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is a pilot study that investigated differences in effectiveness, maintenance of effectiveness, cost-efficiency, satisfaction, and usability of a lottery incentive via mobile devices to promote walking, depending on the chance of winning the lottery, the amount of the prize, and gender. Sixty-six college students (male = 26) were randomly assigned to 3 groups: 10% chance of a big prize (10% + B), 50% chance of a medium prize (50% + M), and 100% chance of a small prize (100% + S). Step counts were collected through mobile devices before and after the intervention, as well as at the 2-month follow-up. The results showed significant increases in the step counts among males after the intervention in the 10% + B and the 50% + M groups, and females in the 100% + S group. Only males in the 50% + M group exhibited maintenance in effectiveness during follow-up. With regard to cost-efficiency, the 10% + B and the 50% + M male groups, which showed significant differences in effectiveness, were compared, and no significant difference was found. With regard to intervention satisfaction, satisfaction of the 10% + B group was lower than that of the 100% + S group. There were no significant interactions or main effects regarding the usability of the intervention. The results suggest that a lottery incentive is effective only for men to promote walking when a medium size prize is given with a 50% of chance of winning the lottery.

show abstract

Section: What Are Your Research’s Implications Towards Theory Practic...mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Pilot Study for Testing the Effectiveness and Cost-Efficiency of Lottery Incentive in mHealth App that Promotes Walking

Lee

Chung

2022

INQUIRY

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A systematic literature review of group contingencies with adults

Fuhrmann‐Knowles,

Deshpande,

Leaf

2024

Behavioral Interventions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A group contingency is one in which a common consequence (e.g., a reinforcer or a punisher) is contingent on the behavior of one member of a group, the behavior of part of a group, or the behavior of every member in a group. The most commonly used group contingencies in behavior‐analytic practice and research include interdependent, independent, and dependent group contingencies. Group contingencies are advantageous for multiple reasons, including their versatility, as they have been demonstrated to be effective across individuals, settings, and behaviors. Additionally, they are efficient as they can facilitate behavior change in multiple individuals at once. Previous literature reviews have supported the use of group contingencies with children; however, there has yet to be a systematic literature review conducted on group contingencies with adults. Because group contingencies have multiple benefits, it is important that a literature review be conducted to assess the evidence of these interventions when implemented with adults. A literature review of studies utilizing group contingencies with adults was conducted. Trends across studies, the efficacy of different group contingencies, clinical implications, and recommendations for future research are provided.

show abstract

Incentive-Based Performance Improvement

Wine

2017

Applied Behavior Analysis Advanced Guidebook

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Effect of Raffle Odds on Signing In at a Treatment Center for Adults with Mental Illness

Cited by 6 publications

References 9 publications

A Pilot Study for Testing the Effectiveness and Cost-Efficiency of Lottery Incentive in mHealth App that Promotes Walking

A Pilot Study for Testing the Effectiveness and Cost-Efficiency of Lottery Incentive in mHealth App that Promotes Walking

A systematic literature review of group contingencies with adults

Incentive-Based Performance Improvement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About