2002
DOI: 10.1375/pplt.2002.9.1.69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Rapport in Forensic Interviewing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
186
3
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
186
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact is perhaps unsurprising, because there are numerous reasons to expect that interviewing witnesses remotely would be counterproductive. For instance, we know that interviewers who take efforts to develop rapport with witnesses can elicit significantly more detailed and accurate memory reports from those witnesses (Collins, Lincoln, & Frank, 2002;Vallano & Schreiber Compo, 2011). However, social psychological research shows that face-to-face interaction is typically beneficial to rapport-building (Drolet & Morris, 2000); other research from the videoconferencing literature suggests that rapport-building is often less successful in VMC than in faceto-face interactions, with mutual liking harder to establish (Fullwood, 2007;Fullwood & Finn, 2010;Straus, Miles, & Levesque, 2001).…”
Section: Videoconferencing With Witnessesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact is perhaps unsurprising, because there are numerous reasons to expect that interviewing witnesses remotely would be counterproductive. For instance, we know that interviewers who take efforts to develop rapport with witnesses can elicit significantly more detailed and accurate memory reports from those witnesses (Collins, Lincoln, & Frank, 2002;Vallano & Schreiber Compo, 2011). However, social psychological research shows that face-to-face interaction is typically beneficial to rapport-building (Drolet & Morris, 2000); other research from the videoconferencing literature suggests that rapport-building is often less successful in VMC than in faceto-face interactions, with mutual liking harder to establish (Fullwood, 2007;Fullwood & Finn, 2010;Straus, Miles, & Levesque, 2001).…”
Section: Videoconferencing With Witnessesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a few studies (Collins, Lincoln, & Frank, 2002;Kieckhaefer et al, 2014;Vallano & Schreiber Compo, 2015) have experimentally examined the influence of rapport with findings indicating that rapport building is beneficial to witness recall, that rapport reduces witness anxiety, and, if post-event information is given, the timing of rapport building is important and does influence eyewitness memory. Even though these studies have showed positive results with regard to the benefits of rapport, the need for more research on forensic rapport is acknowledged (Abbe & Brandon, 2013;Vallano & Schreiber Compo, 2015).…”
Section: Rapportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The desire to maintain a social distance from persons with mental health problems has been found in other studies in the US (Broussard et al 2011) and the UK (Pinfold et al, 2003), and is considered to be one of the factors influencing the quality of interactions between the police and this group of individuals. This could be a crucial component in the interviewing of vulnerable witnesses especially, as good rapport is considered to be imperative to successful witness interviewing practices (Collins, Lincoln & Frank, 2002;Vallano & Como, 2011 …”
Section: Detective Constablementioning
confidence: 99%