2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of recycling bin design on PET bottle collection performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most research on the provisioning of public goods focuses on the problem of people not contributing sufficiently to the public good. For instance, while there are some exceptions (Price, 2020, Heubach, 2019, Jiang et al, 2019, Catlin et al, 2021, Rosenthal and Linder, 2021, De Young et al, 1995, Schultz, 1999, most papers on recycling focus on how to motivate people to recycle more (Tonglet et al, 2004, Chan and Bishop, 2013, Botetzagias et al, 2015, Schultz et al, 1995, Martin et al, 2006, De Young, 1988, Miliute-Plepiene et al, 2016, Li et al, 2021, Lord, 1994, Luyben and Cummings, 1981, Thomas and Sharp, 2013, Barr et al, 2003, Sorkun, 2018, Oskamp et al, 1991, Meneses and Palacio, 2005, Vining and Ebreo, 1992, McCarty and Shrum, 1994 rather than how to motivate them to recycle better. Here, however, we show that problems with public good provisioning can also arise even without lack of motivation to contribute, due to persistent poor information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research on the provisioning of public goods focuses on the problem of people not contributing sufficiently to the public good. For instance, while there are some exceptions (Price, 2020, Heubach, 2019, Jiang et al, 2019, Catlin et al, 2021, Rosenthal and Linder, 2021, De Young et al, 1995, Schultz, 1999, most papers on recycling focus on how to motivate people to recycle more (Tonglet et al, 2004, Chan and Bishop, 2013, Botetzagias et al, 2015, Schultz et al, 1995, Martin et al, 2006, De Young, 1988, Miliute-Plepiene et al, 2016, Li et al, 2021, Lord, 1994, Luyben and Cummings, 1981, Thomas and Sharp, 2013, Barr et al, 2003, Sorkun, 2018, Oskamp et al, 1991, Meneses and Palacio, 2005, Vining and Ebreo, 1992, McCarty and Shrum, 1994 rather than how to motivate them to recycle better. Here, however, we show that problems with public good provisioning can also arise even without lack of motivation to contribute, due to persistent poor information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of materials, components and products is the most important factor for maintaining credibility and reliability in the plastic waste management industry (Hahladakis and Iacovidou, 2018; Jiang et al, 2019). There are some models for plastic waste management to improve the recycling of these materials; a project in Austria, for example, aims to recover plastic packaging recyclables from the waste management system through a ‘catch-all-plastics bin’ programme.…”
Section: Plastic Packaging: Trends and Discussion Of Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another task is to make sure that small e-waste containers are easily accessible and properly labeled [81][82][83]. The residents must be informed of the environmental risk and the benefits of recycling in a circular economy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attractive labeling, including advertising slogans, can be easily understood by individuals to promote environmentally conscious disposal of waste [81,84]. Other containers that were installed in supermarkets and shopping malls a few years ago should be labeled in a better way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%