2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of Regulation Fair Disclosure on expectations management: International evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also evidence that the level of disclosure is moderated by corporate governance variables (board size, directors' share ownership, and ownership concentration) and company-specific characteristics (size, leverage, financial slack, and industry). Our results are also consistent with prior studies on the effect of government regulation or guidance (Canace et al, 2010;Heflin et al, 2012;Kalelkar & Nwaeze, 2011;Llena et al, 2007;Rankin et al, 2011;Sidaway & De Lange, 2011); in addition, although Mangena and Tauringana (2007) did not investigate the effect of DEFRA's guidance, they found disclosure evidence consistent with response to policy or regulation in general. Our results also fit with previous findings on board size (Cormier et al, 2011;Peters & Romi, 2012), NEDs (Brammer and Pavelin (2008)), ownership concentration (Brammer & Pavelin, 2008;Matolcsy, Shan, & Seethamraju, 2012), and managerial ownership (Gelb, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is also evidence that the level of disclosure is moderated by corporate governance variables (board size, directors' share ownership, and ownership concentration) and company-specific characteristics (size, leverage, financial slack, and industry). Our results are also consistent with prior studies on the effect of government regulation or guidance (Canace et al, 2010;Heflin et al, 2012;Kalelkar & Nwaeze, 2011;Llena et al, 2007;Rankin et al, 2011;Sidaway & De Lange, 2011); in addition, although Mangena and Tauringana (2007) did not investigate the effect of DEFRA's guidance, they found disclosure evidence consistent with response to policy or regulation in general. Our results also fit with previous findings on board size (Cormier et al, 2011;Peters & Romi, 2012), NEDs (Brammer and Pavelin (2008)), ownership concentration (Brammer & Pavelin, 2008;Matolcsy, Shan, & Seethamraju, 2012), and managerial ownership (Gelb, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The guidelines proposed by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants had a similar influence on the disclosure pattern of Canadian companies, as reported by Berthelot and Robert (2012). In other disclosure studies, similar evidence has been documented (see Canace, Caylor, Johnson, & Lopez, 2010;Heflin, Kross, & Suk, 2012).…”
Section: Prior Studiessupporting
confidence: 71%
“…As we note above, the ADR sample (337 observations) is significantly smaller than the US sample (11,543 observations) and so tests employing the ADR sample are of lower power. Further, Canace et al (2010) suggest that post-FD changes in expectations management are not significantly different between US and ADR firms. An alternative, and potentially larger, sample of firms not affected by FD, but subject to the same general economic forces as US firms, is Canadian firms.…”
Section: Canadian Firmsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…5 Results regarding FD's impact on analysts' forecasts are mixed. Canace et al (2010) examine the effect of FD on expectations management, which is measured using analyst forecasts and actual earnings. They provide evidence that suggests FD reduced expectations management to meet or beat expectations for both US and ADR firms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[], Canace et al. []). Regarding (2), it should be noted that, while U.S. regulatory changes often become a role model for other countries, the adoption of similar regulation by a foreign jurisdiction takes time and hence would not likely be concurrent.…”
Section: Evidence On the Economic Effects Of Disclosure Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%