Geo-Chicago 2016 2016
DOI: 10.1061/9780784480137.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Rejuvenators on RAP Mixtures: A Study Based on Multiple Scale Laboratory Test Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed that the G-R, T c , and ΔT c had a good correlation with performance tests and field performance. Several other researchers have also found an improvement in performance when using rejuvenator on RAP materials ( 19 , 2528 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Results showed that the G-R, T c , and ΔT c had a good correlation with performance tests and field performance. Several other researchers have also found an improvement in performance when using rejuvenator on RAP materials ( 19 , 2528 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Therefore, due to the air voids in the FAM, such a phase is considered more representative of asphalt mixtures and potentially could be used to estimate the mixture behavior [31]. It was validated that the FAM phases are where the initial thermal crack occurs, and macro crack propagation starts [31,32]. As a result, at low temperatures, FAM materials might be the phase potentially capable of discriminating the behaviors of corresponding mixtures [33,34].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These samples were not collected in consecutive days; collecting data in consecutive days might provide opportunity for happening the bias in data. In addition, the minimum number of data more than 30 for each sample could help that the sample set would be approximately normal [37][38][39][40][41]. Such data sets would be suitable to conduct statistical analysis with reliable results [42][43][44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%