2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(00)00292-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of remanence anisotropy on paleointensity estimates: a case study from the Archean Stillwater Complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
113
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
113
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Selkin et al (2000) reported that the anisotropy of ARM imparted with a high peak AF field reasonably approximated the anisotropy of the total TRM. Because the Shaw method uses only the high coercivity part of NRM and TRM, the anisotropy of the partial ARM of the corresponding coercivity window was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Selkin et al (2000) reported that the anisotropy of ARM imparted with a high peak AF field reasonably approximated the anisotropy of the total TRM. Because the Shaw method uses only the high coercivity part of NRM and TRM, the anisotropy of the partial ARM of the corresponding coercivity window was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…To correct for the effect of anisotropy on paleointensity estimates (Selkin et al, 2000), the anisotropy of partial ARM was measured on samples that were successful in the paleointensity experiments. Selkin et al (2000) reported that the anisotropy of ARM imparted with a high peak AF field reasonably approximated the anisotropy of the total TRM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DRAT and DRATS are two important parameters representing the quality of pTRM checks, which are affected by measurement noise or alteration. DRAT is the maximum difference between pTRM and the pTRM check at a given temperature step normalized by the length of the best fit line (Selkin et al, 2000) while DRATs is the difference sum between pTRM and relative pTRM check normalized by the pTRM acquired by cooling from maximum temperature of the best fit line to room temperature (Kissel and Laj, 2004;Tauxe and Staudigel, 2004). Both are limited to be 10% here.…”
Section: Paleointensity Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TRM anisotropy is sometimes observed in geological samples, but occurs frequently in archaeological artifacts because of manufacturing procedures, which makes the anisotropy correction in archaeological study non-trivial. The bias in paleointensity caused by ATRM can be corrected by determining the anisotropy tensor of each specimen (Selkin et al, 2000;Veitch et al, 1984). This can be determined by anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) or anisotropy of anhysteretic remanent magnetization (AARM) or ATRM.…”
Section: Anisotropy Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation