1979
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(79)90050-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of repeated treatment with dexamethasone on the re-excretion pattern of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus and humoral immune response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, there appeared to be no difference in the ability of either of the two corticosteroids used in this study, dexamethasone and flumethasone (the latter extensively used in veterinary clinical practice), to induce virus reactivation. Significant increases in BHV-l-specific antibody levels in cattle after treatment with dexamethasone have been reported by Pastoret et al [32] and more recently by Guy and Potgieter [11]. However, in the former study, when the corticosteroid was readministered to the animals at a later date, neutralizing antibody titres remained stable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Additionally, there appeared to be no difference in the ability of either of the two corticosteroids used in this study, dexamethasone and flumethasone (the latter extensively used in veterinary clinical practice), to induce virus reactivation. Significant increases in BHV-l-specific antibody levels in cattle after treatment with dexamethasone have been reported by Pastoret et al [32] and more recently by Guy and Potgieter [11]. However, in the former study, when the corticosteroid was readministered to the animals at a later date, neutralizing antibody titres remained stable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Eleven calves in which no virus excretion could be detected after reinfection and/or reactivation even showed a clear systemic IgA antibody response. An explanation for this unexpected tinding may be that in latently infected calves that are given corticosteroids non-infectious physical rather than infectious BHVl particles may be produced (Pastoret et al, 1979). These physical particles stimulate an antibody response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) The primary immune response acquired following a BoHV-1 natural exposure or a vaccination scheme is able to successfully control the re-excretion of any latent carrier. The secondary immune response boosted by successive reactivation stimulus is also effective at inhibiting virus re-excretion [155]. Therefore, reactivation stimulus occurring in the first two months following the primary infection is not expected to give rise to virus reexcretion.…”
Section: Latency and Reactivationmentioning
confidence: 99%