2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2011.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of rigid-body motions on the whipping response of a ship hull subjected to an underwater bubble

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of TNT charge, the maximum bubble radii of explosive gas, max , and first pulsation periods, , are expressed as [19]:…”
Section: The Undex Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of TNT charge, the maximum bubble radii of explosive gas, max , and first pulsation periods, , are expressed as [19]:…”
Section: The Undex Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on the interaction between the bubble and nearby structures below the free surface have paid more attention to the physical phenomena in some specific engineering scenarios, such as the rise and fall of the free surface (Liu et al 2016;Zhang et al 2017), interaction between the bubble and a vessel (Klaseboer, Khoo & Hung 2005b;Zhang & Zong 2011;Zhang, Zong & Zhang 2014), and deformation of the floating structure caused by bubble pulsations (Klaseboer et al 2005a;Zong et al 2015). Some parametric analysis of the bubble collapse has been conducted: Kiyama et al (2021) and Tagawa & Peters (2018) used the method of images to develop a theoretical model for determining the jet direction when a cavity is near a corner; Molefe & Peters (2019) studied the jet direction when a cavity is within rectangular and triangular channels; Andrews, Rivas & Peters (2020) predicted the jet direction near a slot with the boundary integral method (BIM); and Brujan conducted comprehensive studies on the corner of two or three rigid boundaries (Brujan et al 2018;Brujan, Hiroyuki & Toshiyuki 2019;Brujan et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2016; Zhang et al. 2017), interaction between the bubble and a vessel (Klaseboer, Khoo & Hung 2005 b ; Zhang & Zong 2011; Zhang, Zong & Zhang 2014), and deformation of the floating structure caused by bubble pulsations (Klaseboer et al. 2005 a ; Zong et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this phase, the compressibility of the fluid must be considered to simulate the propagation of the shockwave and the radiation effects of the structure. The bubble load with long period can induce the overall whipping responses and the rigid motion that threaten the global strength [Zhang and Zong (2011); Stettler (1995); Hicks (1986); Vernon (1986); Wilkerson (1985)]. For this problem, BEM based on potential flow theory is one of the most widely used methods, because the viscosity and the compressibility of the fluid are neglectable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this problem, BEM based on potential flow theory is one of the most widely used methods, because the viscosity and the compressibility of the fluid are neglectable. Zhang et al [Zhang and Zong (2011)] studied the dynamic responses of a surface ship subjected to underwater explosion bubble, and found that rigid motions cannot be ignored for shorter/wider hulls. Lu et al [Lu, He and Wu (2000)] presented a completely coupled method for the hydroelastic interaction during the impact of a structure with water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%