2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01208-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of rupture directivity, distance and skew angle on the collapse fragilities of bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main beam displacement is simultaneously limited to some extent by the abutment, adjacent span, and shear key [11,12], but the seismic force delivered to the substructure is increased [13]. The collision causes a significant seismic displacement response, especially the response of bearing, abutment, and shear key, and it is necessary to increase the seismic response demand of shear keys under a strong earthquake [14,15]. Based on the above researches, it becomes clear that the skew angle and the collision significantly affect the seismic response of the skew bridge, which need to be considered in a further analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main beam displacement is simultaneously limited to some extent by the abutment, adjacent span, and shear key [11,12], but the seismic force delivered to the substructure is increased [13]. The collision causes a significant seismic displacement response, especially the response of bearing, abutment, and shear key, and it is necessary to increase the seismic response demand of shear keys under a strong earthquake [14,15]. Based on the above researches, it becomes clear that the skew angle and the collision significantly affect the seismic response of the skew bridge, which need to be considered in a further analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the directivity effect can lead to potentially destructive pulses at low frequencies characterized by large amplitudes of ground motion (Boatwright, 2007;Kurzon et al, 2014;Moratto et al, 2017;. Therefore, knowledge of the kinematic finite source parameters and expected rupture directions for high and moderate magnitude events is critical for earthquake engineering applications (Moratto et al, 2021;Somala et al, 2021;Moratto et al, 2023) and for appropriate risk assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, over the past few decades, studies focused on multi-hazard vulnerability analyses have gained momentum [8]. Accordingly, multi-hazard fragility analysis is widely reported in existing literature considering earthquake, tsunami, flood, scour, and other forces [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Mosleh et al [16] performed seismic vulnerability of pre-1990 concrete bridge and developed analytical fragility functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%