2013
DOI: 10.1177/0974909820130708s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Sandblasting on the Retention of Orthodontic Bands: An in vitro Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be observed, with respect to the results of shear strength of the two groups studied, no statistical differences between the different surface treatments were found. Since the basic composition of the specific resins for Orthodontics resembles that found in restorative resins, it was believed in this study that these could present real conditions to be used in Orthodontics, satisfying the minimum acceptable values acceptable the shear strength of orthodontic devices, which according to Reynolds (1975), should be between 4.9 MPa and 7.8 MPa (Nakamichi et al, 1983;Herion et al, 2007;Millett et al, 2009;Santos et al, 2010;Nalawade et al, 2013;Sharma et al, 2014;Caglaroglu et al).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…As can be observed, with respect to the results of shear strength of the two groups studied, no statistical differences between the different surface treatments were found. Since the basic composition of the specific resins for Orthodontics resembles that found in restorative resins, it was believed in this study that these could present real conditions to be used in Orthodontics, satisfying the minimum acceptable values acceptable the shear strength of orthodontic devices, which according to Reynolds (1975), should be between 4.9 MPa and 7.8 MPa (Nakamichi et al, 1983;Herion et al, 2007;Millett et al, 2009;Santos et al, 2010;Nalawade et al, 2013;Sharma et al, 2014;Caglaroglu et al).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This could be due the reason that the sandblasting procedure roughens the surface of the metal, which increases the surface area available for bonding, which further increases the retention of bands. 8 A study done by Aggarwal M et al (2000) revealed that the factory micro etching of the luting surface of stainless steel bands provide almost double the band retention compared with the in -practice sandblasting of bands. 15 Dastjerdie EV et al (2010) stated that a coarse factory etched surface aided retention, while a finer in-office pattern reduced the shear peel band strength to almost half of that of factory etched band.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sandblasting procedure introduced in the 1950s uses a high speed stream of aluminium oxide particles propelled by compressed air. 8 Sandblasting of the metal surface improve retention by roughening, thereby increasing the surface area and providing the potential for a degree of mechanical attachment. In a study by Zachrisson et al a threefold increase in composite resin to metal adhesion following treatment by sandblasting have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%