2014
DOI: 10.3386/w20118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of School Finance Reforms on the Distribution of Spending, Academic Achievement, and Adult Outcomes

Abstract: We wish to thank the PSID staff for access to the confidential restricted-use PSID geocode data. We are grateful for helpful comments received from seminar participants at UC-Berkeley and Harvard University. This project was supported by research grants received from the National Science Foundation under Award Number 1324778 (Jackson), and from the Russell Sage Foundation (Johnson). The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, what matters is the way in which schools allocate their available resources into staffing, curriculum priorities, and organizational structures that provide students with access to high-quality learning experiences (Elmore & Fuhrman, 1993;Hanushek, 1981;Murnane, 1982). In addition, more recent research provides compelling evidence that increased school spending can improve the educational and lifetime outcomes of children from disadvantaged backgrounds (Jackson, Johnson, & Persico, 2014). Thus, states must pay attention to access to resources indicators including the level of school funding; staffing; availability of up-to-date textbooks, materials, and technology; class size; availability of professional learning experiences for teachers; and the like.…”
Section: Measures Of Opportunities To Learnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, what matters is the way in which schools allocate their available resources into staffing, curriculum priorities, and organizational structures that provide students with access to high-quality learning experiences (Elmore & Fuhrman, 1993;Hanushek, 1981;Murnane, 1982). In addition, more recent research provides compelling evidence that increased school spending can improve the educational and lifetime outcomes of children from disadvantaged backgrounds (Jackson, Johnson, & Persico, 2014). Thus, states must pay attention to access to resources indicators including the level of school funding; staffing; availability of up-to-date textbooks, materials, and technology; class size; availability of professional learning experiences for teachers; and the like.…”
Section: Measures Of Opportunities To Learnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this clean "predicted" variation in spending, one can then test whether exposed cohorts have better outcomes relative to unexposed cohorts in those districts that are predicted (based on pre-reform characteristics) to experience larger reform-induced spending increases. By 6 See Jackson, Johnson, and Persico (2014) for an in depth discussion of school finance reforms.…”
Section: A Isolating Exogenous Variation In School Spendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Countywide job losses reduced the viability of the local economy by decreasing property values and tax revenues throughout the county , which could have lowered public schools’ resources. Similarly, during the Great Recession, states with the largest increases in unemployment also had lower levels of government spending, particularly on education (; school spending is linked strongly with positive academic and behavioral outcomes for children; ).…”
Section: Pathways Of Community‐level Influencementioning
confidence: 99%