2018
DOI: 10.17221/136/2018-pse
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of seed priming on field emergence and root yield of sugar beet

Abstract: The effect of sugar beet seed (primed and non-primed) on field emergence and root yield of sugar beet was examined. The experiment was realized in the years 2012–2014 at an Experiment Field Station of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW Faculty of Agriculture and Biology in Skierniewice (51°97'N, 20°19'E) in Poland. The experimental factor was diversified seed material of the same cultivar of sugar beet – typical seeds, traditionally prepared for sowing (non-primed seeds) and seeds before sowing, subject… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sugar loss% was increased as the intra-row planting distances was increased from 10 (2.58 and 52%) to 15 cm (2.76 and 2.53%) in the first and second growing seasons, respectively. These results are in agreement with those reported by Beata et al (2018) and Khaiti (2012). Table 8 Mean values of all studied traits as affected by the interaction between intra-row planting distances and sugar beet varieties in the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 growing seasons.…”
Section: Ekbsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sugar loss% was increased as the intra-row planting distances was increased from 10 (2.58 and 52%) to 15 cm (2.76 and 2.53%) in the first and second growing seasons, respectively. These results are in agreement with those reported by Beata et al (2018) and Khaiti (2012). Table 8 Mean values of all studied traits as affected by the interaction between intra-row planting distances and sugar beet varieties in the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 growing seasons.…”
Section: Ekbsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Quality index% and recoverable sugar% were significantly increased in response to decreasing the intra-row planting distances from 10 to 15 cm (from 77.88 and 76.68 and from16.00 and 15.80% under 10 cm to 79.16 and 77.78 and 14.87 and 15.30% under 15 cm in the first and second growing seasons, respectively. These results are in agreement with those reported by Beata et al (2018) andKhaiti (2012). The high sugar content produced from the low intra-row planting distances could be attributed to that the partitioning of photoassimilates was in favor of improving sugar content under the low intra-row planting distances where it was reduced (Hosseini et al 2019;Koch et al 2019;Lemoine et al 2013;Sowiński 1999).…”
Section: Ekbsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Also, from Table 3 it can be noticed that the total soluble solids recorded 19.20, 20.83 and 22.32% at age of 150, 180 and 210 harvest days; respectively. Similar results were reported by ElSharnouby et al (1999); Abido et al (2015) and Michalska-Klimczak et al (2019).…”
Section: Also From Tablesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The maybe attributed to the decrease in temperature at the time of harvest. These results are in agreement with the findings of El-Sheikh et al (2009); Michalska-Klimczak et al (2019) and Abido et al (2015). The invert sugar in the crown, slice, and roots, according to Strochalska et al (2014) was 0.72, 0.71, and 0.23%, respectively.…”
Section: Also From Tablesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Priming promotes germination rate and uniformity due to some kind of metabolic repair of seeds during imbibition, build-up of germination-enhancing metabolites, osmotic adjustment, and a simple reduction in imbibition lag time [1]. The beneficial effects of priming have been observed in several field crops, such as wheat, maize, sugar beet, soybean, sunflower beans, carrot, leek and onion, celery, lettuce, endive, pepper, tomato [1,21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%