2016
DOI: 10.1039/c5cp07804k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of sequence on the ionization of guanine in DNA

Abstract: The accurate estimation of the ionization energies and understanding the nature of the ionized states of the nucleic acid bases (NABs) are crucial to the understanding of the DNA damage mechanism. The vertical ionization energy (VIE) of guanine is the lowest among the NABs and the ionization energies are strongly affected by the environment, such as solvation and characteristics of nearby NABs. Therefore, we investigate the sequence dependence of the VIEs of guanine in B-DNA. We use the equation of motion coup… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
5
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A plot of ωB97X-D3 values vs IP-EOM-DLPNO-CCSD values ( Figure 6) for the first ionized states gives an almost perfectly straight line fit. So, as observed in the previous studies by Ghosh and co-workers, [42] the DFT/ωB97X-D3 method can be a good alternative for the EOM-CCSD methods. However, the Δ-based nature of calculation restricts it only to the first IP values.…”
Section: Ionization Energysupporting
confidence: 71%
“…A plot of ωB97X-D3 values vs IP-EOM-DLPNO-CCSD values ( Figure 6) for the first ionized states gives an almost perfectly straight line fit. So, as observed in the previous studies by Ghosh and co-workers, [42] the DFT/ωB97X-D3 method can be a good alternative for the EOM-CCSD methods. However, the Δ-based nature of calculation restricts it only to the first IP values.…”
Section: Ionization Energysupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In Figure 2a, the first main VIE (VIE #1) computed by the GFCCSD approach in this work is reduced from ∼7.02 eV in [G−C] 1 to ∼6.64 eV in [G−C] 3 , showing same tendency as the gas phase B3LYP results based on the same geometries and base set. 11 Further comparison shows the B3LYP result is ∼0.2 eV higher than the GFCCSD result for [G−C] 1 , which is close to the deviation reported in another work 10 where the gas phase EOM-IP-CCSD result of a similar G−C single base pair was ∼0.15 eV lower than the DFT result using ωB97x-D density functional. As the system expands to [G−C] 2 and [G−C] 3 , the B3LYP results then become consistently ∼0.2 eV lower than the GFCCSD results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…[26][27][28][29] In our earlier work, we have studied the effect of sequence on the vertical ionization energies (VIEs) of NABs, especially guanine. [30] We have shown that stacking can reduce the VIEs considerably, especially when there is a long -GGG-sequence. We have also shown the length scale of the interactions with neighboring NABs that affect the VIEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The electron detachment from the NABs in DNA depends on factors such as hydrogen bonding, sequence of DNA, solvent interactions as well as thermal fluctuations . In our earlier work, we have studied the effect of sequence on the vertical ionization energies (VIEs) of NABs, especially guanine . We have shown that stacking can reduce the VIEs considerably, especially when there is a long –GGG– sequence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%