2001
DOI: 10.1080/00207210110044396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of series resistance on calculation of the interface state density distribution in Schottky diodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This function is derived from the thermionic current expression given in equation (1 The voltage dependence of the BH in the MIS diodes, that is, the barrier increase with increasing forward bias voltage in the forward bias I -V measurements comes from the potential change across the interfacial layer rather than from image force lowering. The potential drop across the HfO 2 interfacial layer varies with bias due to the electrical field present in the semiconductor and the change in the interface state charge as a result of the applied voltage, and thus modifies the BH [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. As mentioned by Budhraja et al [22,23], the interface Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This function is derived from the thermionic current expression given in equation (1 The voltage dependence of the BH in the MIS diodes, that is, the barrier increase with increasing forward bias voltage in the forward bias I -V measurements comes from the potential change across the interfacial layer rather than from image force lowering. The potential drop across the HfO 2 interfacial layer varies with bias due to the electrical field present in the semiconductor and the change in the interface state charge as a result of the applied voltage, and thus modifies the BH [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. As mentioned by Budhraja et al [22,23], the interface Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the potential fluctuation model [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] which is related to thermionic emission over a GD of Schottky barriers, the temperature dependence expressions of the ideality factor and BH are given by [41][42][43] 1…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…İdeal ve kaliteli bir diyot yapılabilmesi için kontak haline getirilecek maddelerin yüzeylerinin çok iyi bir şekilde temiz, parlak, oksitsiz ve pürüzsüz, organik ve ağır metal kirliliklerden arındırılmış olmalarının önemi büyüktür. Bu parçaların kimyasal olarak temizlenmesinde RCA1 ve RCA2 prosedürleri takip edildi [12][13].…”
Section: Materyal Ve Metod 21 Numunenin Temizlenmesi Ve Kontak Için unclassified
“…In this article, Schottky parameters have been examined for both situations; forward bias and reverse bias. Ideality factor (IF) (nIV) [1,2], barrier height (ΦBH) [3,4], Cheung functions (Ch1, Ch2) [5,6], built-in potential (Vbi) [1,2], donor density (ND) [7], zero-voltage depletion length (W0 or L0), interfacial thickness (Dit) [6], interface state density (NSS) [8,9] and effective Fermi level (EF) are known as Schottky parameters [10]. A Schottky diode is comprised of four sections, namely ohmic junction, base structure, depletion layer and Schottky junction [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%