2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2844943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Shareholder Voting Requirements on Method of Payment and Performance Outcomes in Acquisitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Mason et al. (2017), we create a binary variable, TwentyPct , which takes a value of 1 when the 20% threshold is met and 0 otherwise. We find that 27% of sample deals with public acquirers, 83% of both FTV deals, and 23% of target FTV deals meet these criteria.…”
Section: Robustness Tests and Additional Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following Mason et al. (2017), we create a binary variable, TwentyPct , which takes a value of 1 when the 20% threshold is met and 0 otherwise. We find that 27% of sample deals with public acquirers, 83% of both FTV deals, and 23% of target FTV deals meet these criteria.…”
Section: Robustness Tests and Additional Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our paper complements the literature examining the motivation and impact on merger outcomes of various contractual provisions in M&A deals, such as termination fee provisions (Bates & Lemmon, 2003; Officer, 2003), collars (Officer, 2004, 2006), lock‐up options (Burch, 2001), go‐shop provisions (Gogineni & Puthenpurackal, 2017), and material adverse clauses (Denis &Macias, 2013). We also contribute to a nascent literature on shareholder voting in the approval process for M&A deals (Becht et al., 2016; Harford et al., 2011; Hsieh & Wang, 2008; Kamar, 2011; Li et al., 2018; Mason et al., 2017; Matvos & Ostrovsky, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%