2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.02.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of shear flow on microreactor clogging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coating (for example by poly-l-lysine) to obtain stable nonpyrogenic MNP suspension [115] product homogeneity quality reduction by concentration gradients and hot spots in the reaction flask [25,51] enhanced quality due to homogeneous morphology, narrow size distribution [25,67,116] high within one bacteria strain but strain variation possible [52][53][54]95] reproducibility, production rate and scale-up capability significant batch to batch variations in size, morphology, and magnetic properties [25,111,[117][118][119], poor scaling up capability. A reported study from Lin et al showed a production rate of 4.73 g/h for microfluidic synthesis comparing to 1.4 g/h for conventional synthesis with the same conditions [89] continuous production, no batch-to-batch variation, high scale-up capability high at the defined environmental conditions [92], mg/(L • day) production rate [52], high scale-up capability, though challenging due to long term bacteriostatic growth conditions [38,40,46,78] clogging not applicable microchannel-wall blocking during nucleation or by agglomeration [77,104,[120][121][122] not applicable automation poor feasible/integratable [66,123,124] capability of online characterization not applicable for batch, though magnetic characterization of whole batches by magnetic particle spectroscopy is feasible parameter control and synthesis adjustment feasible during synthesis, control of magnetic parameters by magnetic particle spectroscopy [25,125] and NMR [126] cost low, common lab equipment expensive microreactor fabrication expensive specialized equipment…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Synthesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coating (for example by poly-l-lysine) to obtain stable nonpyrogenic MNP suspension [115] product homogeneity quality reduction by concentration gradients and hot spots in the reaction flask [25,51] enhanced quality due to homogeneous morphology, narrow size distribution [25,67,116] high within one bacteria strain but strain variation possible [52][53][54]95] reproducibility, production rate and scale-up capability significant batch to batch variations in size, morphology, and magnetic properties [25,111,[117][118][119], poor scaling up capability. A reported study from Lin et al showed a production rate of 4.73 g/h for microfluidic synthesis comparing to 1.4 g/h for conventional synthesis with the same conditions [89] continuous production, no batch-to-batch variation, high scale-up capability high at the defined environmental conditions [92], mg/(L • day) production rate [52], high scale-up capability, though challenging due to long term bacteriostatic growth conditions [38,40,46,78] clogging not applicable microchannel-wall blocking during nucleation or by agglomeration [77,104,[120][121][122] not applicable automation poor feasible/integratable [66,123,124] capability of online characterization not applicable for batch, though magnetic characterization of whole batches by magnetic particle spectroscopy is feasible parameter control and synthesis adjustment feasible during synthesis, control of magnetic parameters by magnetic particle spectroscopy [25,125] and NMR [126] cost low, common lab equipment expensive microreactor fabrication expensive specialized equipment…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Synthesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final image is produced by the consecutive magnifications of the objective lenses (placed near the specimen) and the ocular and can be viewed directly or captured via a digital camera (e.g., digital video microscopy) [ 144 ]. Especially for fouling investigations, high-speed cameras constitute an essential tool to monitor the phenomena happening at very short times, such as foulants deposition and pore clogging [ 145 , 146 ].…”
Section: Dynamic Investigation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They eventually cause local clustering of particles or the formation of particle arches. The deposition of particles was found to be the start of the clogging process, and these deposited particles could act as obstacles to further capture other suspended particles from the flow 23,24,25 . Thus, both the growth of deposited particle dendrites and the agglomeration of suspended particles could augment the clogging phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%