2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2012.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of shore location on biomarker expression in wild Mytilus spp. and its comparison with long line cultivated mussels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[34] Chemical analyses Selection of suitable chemical concentrations for exposure is a crucial aspect of experimental design. In addition CF values were in the same range as those previously published for wild animals taken from the same mussel population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[34] Chemical analyses Selection of suitable chemical concentrations for exposure is a crucial aspect of experimental design. In addition CF values were in the same range as those previously published for wild animals taken from the same mussel population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition CF values were in the same range as those previously published for wild animals taken from the same mussel population. [34] Chemical analyses…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study is unique in its design as it completes the study from the same location performed by Nahrgang et al (2013) with continuous logging of environmental conditions over the entire year, description of the reproductive cycle of the local mussels, their monthly levels of the baseline biomarkers, and the validation of the findings of this location across a spatial sampling. In addition, measurement of the baseline biomarker levels in the mussels from upper and lower littoral zone underlines the importance of the tidal zone for future biomonitoring studies previously reported only in few papers (Izagirre et al, 2008;Letendre et al, 2009;Schmidt et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We hypothesized that the levels of biomarkers vary over the course of a year due to changes in biological function associated with the annual reproductive cycle (Schmidt et al, 2013;González-Fernández et al, 2016) and seasonality in environmental conditions (photoperiod, temperature, salinity and food supply) (Bebianno et al, 2007;Brenner et al, 2014). Moreover, differences in biomarkers related to the location of the mussels within the mussel bed were expected (Letendre et al, 2009;Schmidt et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bivalve (Vidal et al, 2002) Bivalve (Vidal et al, 2002) Bivalve (Schmidt et al, 2012 Crustacean (Naylor et al, 1989;Maltby et al, 2002) Crustacean (Maltby et al, 1990) Crustacean (McCahon et al, 1988;Pascoe et al, 1995;Fielding et al, 2003) Energy…”
Section: ) Lysosomal Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%