2021
DOI: 10.12669/pjms.37.7.4013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of short-term intensive insulin therapy in newly-diagnosed Type-2 diabetic patients

Abstract: Objectives: We aimed to determine the effect of short-term intensive insulin therapy (SIIT) on long-term glycemic control in newly-diagnosed Type-2 diabetes mellitus (nT2DM) patients. Methods: In this retrospectively study conducted at Sakarya University Medical Faculty Training and Research Hospital Outpatient Clinic between 2016 and 2019, 65 nT2DM patients were enrolled soon after their SIIT was initiated and were followed for at least a year. Intensive insulin treatment was discontinued after three or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This led to a higher rates of well-controlled glycemic levels (78.8% vs. 67.3%), and a shorter timeframe (442.08 ± 350.06 vs. 513.92 ± 388.93 days) in OAD group compared to early insulinization group.Our study ndings differ from prior investigations conducted by Weng et al,Ryan et al, and Karacaer et al. (8,9,25), which showed a greater percentage of patients attaining target glycemic control within a shorter timeframe in the insulin group compared to those receiving OADs. Their methods involved continuous subcutaneous infusion insulin (CS II) or multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) with daily dosage adjustments (8, 9, 25), contrasting our insulin approach characterized by reduced intensity of injection and monitoring.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This led to a higher rates of well-controlled glycemic levels (78.8% vs. 67.3%), and a shorter timeframe (442.08 ± 350.06 vs. 513.92 ± 388.93 days) in OAD group compared to early insulinization group.Our study ndings differ from prior investigations conducted by Weng et al,Ryan et al, and Karacaer et al. (8,9,25), which showed a greater percentage of patients attaining target glycemic control within a shorter timeframe in the insulin group compared to those receiving OADs. Their methods involved continuous subcutaneous infusion insulin (CS II) or multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) with daily dosage adjustments (8, 9, 25), contrasting our insulin approach characterized by reduced intensity of injection and monitoring.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“… 2 , 3 Currently, measures such as insulin injections, oral hypoglycemic drugs, antiplatelet aggregation drugs, and blood lipid regulators are commonly used for managing patients with T2DM and MetS (T2DM MetS). 3 , 4 These measures can alleviate clinical symptoms to a certain extent, but the overall effect is suboptimal. 2 , 4 , 5 In addition to pharmacological agents, dietary management is also an important way of managing T2DM with MetS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] Reducing the hyperglycemic status of hospitalised patients can shorten the length of stay, improve prognosis and save hospitalisation costs. [6][7][8] In T2DM patients with poor glycaemic control, especially those with glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 8.0%, the absolute contribution of fasting hyperglycaemia to excess HbA1c value increases dramatically as blood glucose levels deteriorate. 9,10 Therefore, aggressive use of basal insulin (BI) to bring fasting glucose to target is particularly important for treating HH and improving the prognosis of patients with T2DM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basal–prandial insulin therapy (BPIT) is the preferred treatment for noncritically ill patients 3–5 . Reducing the hyperglycemic status of hospitalised patients can shorten the length of stay, improve prognosis and save hospitalisation costs 6–8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%