2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of silicon on the nanoprecipitation of cementite

Abstract: The current work presents a comprehensive study that aims at understanding the role of silicon on θ precipitation, as well as on the ε → θ carbide transition in tempered martensite. Cementite nucleation was modelled under paraequilibrium conditions in order to ensure silicon's presence in the carbide, where both thermodynamic and misfit strain energies were calculated to evaluate the overall free energy change. The growth stage was investigated using in situ synchrotron radiation; three alloys containing a wid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Fe-0.43C-3.0Mn-2.12Si alloy, Figure 5(a), the experimental values of C g stasis are close to the GEB model predictions but below the T ′ 0 model assuming a strain energy of 400 J/mol. The high Si content in this system is known to suppress carbide formation [26,27], hence neglecting the carbide formation in the GEB model is an accurate assumption for this system. In Fe-0.1C-1.5Mn-0.3Mo alloy, Figure 5(b), the experimental values of C g stasis are much lower than the predictions by the GEB model but correspond better to the predictions of the T 0 and T ′ 0 model (assuming a strain energy of 200 J/mol) predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Fe-0.43C-3.0Mn-2.12Si alloy, Figure 5(a), the experimental values of C g stasis are close to the GEB model predictions but below the T ′ 0 model assuming a strain energy of 400 J/mol. The high Si content in this system is known to suppress carbide formation [26,27], hence neglecting the carbide formation in the GEB model is an accurate assumption for this system. In Fe-0.1C-1.5Mn-0.3Mo alloy, Figure 5(b), the experimental values of C g stasis are much lower than the predictions by the GEB model but correspond better to the predictions of the T 0 and T ′ 0 model (assuming a strain energy of 200 J/mol) predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Si is known to retard the cementite formation, however, it does not completely suppress the precipitation and cementite will appear after a long annealing times. [56,57] It is worth noting that considering the observed effect of simulation cell size on the predicted value of f c , it is clear that varying the cell size does not affect the overall trend of predicted fractions for both c fi a and the a¢ fi c transformations. In the current analysis, the cell length of a¢ fi c is taken the same as the c fi a transformation, i.e., 50 lm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was well reported that e-carbide was usually precipitated at the early stage of martensite tempering followed by carbide transition from e-carbide into cementite [23,24].…”
Section: Microstructure Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%