The effect of single/multiple micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and its possible complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mohaghegh, Sadra; Kouhestani, Farnaz; Motamedian, Saeed Reza

doi:10.1016/j.ortho.2021.02.001

Cited by 16 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 52 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, they can also produce jiggling forces [40,[80][81][82][83]. This is not commonly reported [38], as determining its occurrence is difficult [38,81,[84][85][86][87].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Complications Arising Due to Orthodontic Treatment—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Alam

Kanwal²,

Abutayyem

et al. 2023

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A variety of metals and alloys are employed in the field of orthodontics, of which the construction of wires happens to be predominant. Through this systematic review, our primary goal was to review and assess studies focusing on complications that emerged during or directly after the completion of an orthodontic treatment plan. We then used a meta-analysis to determine how these complications affected the patients who were receiving orthodontic treatment. A total of 634 documents were discovered after a thorough search of online journals, and 416 of the papers were initially selected. In the end, 14 papers, including in vitro experiments, literature reviews, comparative analyses, observational studies, and retrospective studies, were chosen that met the requisite inclusion and exclusion criteria. There were difficulties related to orthodontic treatment in all of the studies listed in our systematic review, but their severity varied greatly. The effects of gingival mucosa and root resorption were two of the most often mentioned periodontal problems in this review. More long-term studies are required to confirm the involvement of an orthodontic component in these issues, but the majority of the complications were assessed to initially arise after the treatment plan had begun and to resolve with time.

show abstract

“…However, they can also produce jiggling forces [40,[80][81][82][83]. This is not commonly reported [38], as determining its occurrence is difficult [38,81,[84][85][86][87].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Complications Arising Due to Orthodontic Treatment—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Alam

Kanwal²,

Abutayyem

et al. 2023

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mohaghegh S et al 25 Int Orthod. 2021 Adverse Effect not mentioned Li J et al 26 Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of exaggerated claims in the abstracts of systematic reviews reporting accelerated orthodontic tooth movement: a meta research analysis

Shyagali

Rathore

Kapoor

et al. 2022

Australasian Orthodontic Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The latest trend in scientific literature review is to scrutinise the practices of false or biased reporting of findings, which is rightly termed as ‘spin’. In recent years, accelerated tooth movement has gained attention from the orthodontic community, but the findings still remain unclear and controversial. Objectives To estimate the frequency of distorted claims and over-interpretation of abstracts of systematic reviews related to accelerated orthodontic tooth movement. The objective was to differentiate the type of claim and to determine its prevalence. Methods A literature search was performed using the Cochrane library and the top five most prominent orthodontic journals for systematic reviews on accelerated orthodontics were identified by applying appropriate key words. According to pre-set selection criteria, only systematic reviews published between January 2010 and September 2021 were included. The selected articles were scrutinised for the assigned exclusion criteria. The articles were finally scanned for false claims by two independent reviewers. The identified claims fell into either the categories of misleading interpretation, misleading reporting or misleading extrapolation. The obtained data were tabulated and analysed using the one-way ANOVA statistical test to indicate the difference between the different types of reported claims. Results There were 98 systematic reviews identified in total, of which 59 articles met the selection criteria and 39 articles were excluded. Of the 59 included articles, 38 systematic reviews had exaggerated claims. Twenty-two of the reported claims came under the misleading reporting category, 10 fell under the misleading interpretation category and 6 came under the misleading extrapolation category. The difference noted between the reporting prevalence of different types of claim was statistically significant (P < 0.001). In misleading reporting, it was noted that most of the systematic reviews refrained from reporting the adverse effects of treatment. Conclusion The prevalence of exaggerated claims is high in the abstracts of systematic reviews related to accelerated orthodontic tooth movement. It is recommended that a clinician critically assess the claims presented in systematic reviews which are considered to be the hallmark articles of evidence-based practice. Orthodontists should be careful when applying the findings in clinical practice.

show abstract

“…While it is widely accepted 4,14,16,24 that the use of orthodontic force often results in unwanted OIERR on the treated dentition, there are limited high quality, well-designed studies measuring the effect of SAPATM on OIERR. Adjunctive corticotomy use in orthodontics is regularly studied, although most publications are case presentations and are used to highlight procedural effectiveness in accelerating tooth movement and safety profile.…”

Section: Summary Of Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The results reveal a paucity of high-quality studies on SAPATM, as the inclusion of non-randomised trials and cohort studies may be considered to reduce the strength of findings and recommendations. Most recently, a review by Mogaghegh et al 24 analysed the effect of MOPs on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and its possible complications. The paper was limited by the analysis of only one type of SAPATM.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Orthodontic root resorption associated with surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating tooth movement: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Shukla

Currell

Knight

et al. 2022

Australasian Orthodontic Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The present systematic review assesses the literature which identifies an association between surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating tooth movement (SAPATM) during orthodontic therapy and orthodontically induced external root resorption (OIERR). By determining the level of association, the results may provide clinical evidence for minimising the deleterious effects of orthodontic tooth movement. Methods Electronic databases including Medline, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Worldcat, OpenGrey, and the Cochrane Library were searched and followed by further searches from citations of included articles. Searches were undertaken with no restrictions on year, publication status, nor language. The selection criteria included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted using surgical procedures to accelerate orthodontic therapy in conjunction with fixed orthodontic appliances on human patients. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) Tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Inter-rater agreement of the review authors was used for the inclusion of primary articles, RoB assessment and evaluation of the quality of evidence (GRADE) and was calculated using Cohen’s kappa statistic. Results A total of 1118 articles were retrieved in the initial search. After the review process, 13 article trials met the inclusion criteria. Sample sizes ranged from 20 to 52 patients. Two studies showed a statistically significant reduction in OIERR, with a third showing both an increase and decrease of OIERR on different roots of the same maxillary molar tooth. A significant decrease in treatment time was shown by four studies, while six studies showed increased tooth movement. All included studies were classified as having low to minor concerns of bias and a low quality of evidence. Conclusions There is an apparent shortage of well-designed and reported RCTs on the effect of SAPATM on OIERR. However, there is some evidence to suggest OIERR is reduced following SAPATM. The use of SAPATM is also shown to increase tooth movement and reduce overall treatment time, but its benefits may be considered limited to the initial post-operative period.

show abstract

The effect of single/multiple micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and its possible complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cited by 16 publications

References 52 publications

Complications Arising Due to Orthodontic Treatment—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Complications Arising Due to Orthodontic Treatment—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Evaluation of exaggerated claims in the abstracts of systematic reviews reporting accelerated orthodontic tooth movement: a meta research analysis

Orthodontic root resorption associated with surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating tooth movement: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About