2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of sire dominance and aggression on fitness measures in a field cricket (Gryllus assimilis)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a non‐significant trend for smaller G. assimilis females to oviposit more eggs than larger females. This negative trend was unexpected, given previous studies revealed larger G. assimilis females are more fecund (e.g., Bertram & Rook, ; Bertram et al., ; Loranger & Bertram, ), a relationship found in almost all field crickets studied to date (e.g., G. bimaculatus : Bateman et al., ; G. texensis : Shoemaker, ; Teleogryllus oceanicus : Simmons & Garcia‐Gonzalez, ; G. integer : Hedrick & Kortet, ; G. assimilis : Bertram et al., ; Loranger & Bertram, ). Our suspicion is that larger G. assimilis females did, in fact, have higher “potential” for offspring production, but they did not allocate all their eggs according to their potential, as they were not allowed to perform free mate choice or mate multiply as they would have in the wild.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There was a non‐significant trend for smaller G. assimilis females to oviposit more eggs than larger females. This negative trend was unexpected, given previous studies revealed larger G. assimilis females are more fecund (e.g., Bertram & Rook, ; Bertram et al., ; Loranger & Bertram, ), a relationship found in almost all field crickets studied to date (e.g., G. bimaculatus : Bateman et al., ; G. texensis : Shoemaker, ; Teleogryllus oceanicus : Simmons & Garcia‐Gonzalez, ; G. integer : Hedrick & Kortet, ; G. assimilis : Bertram et al., ; Loranger & Bertram, ). Our suspicion is that larger G. assimilis females did, in fact, have higher “potential” for offspring production, but they did not allocate all their eggs according to their potential, as they were not allowed to perform free mate choice or mate multiply as they would have in the wild.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…There was a non-significant trend for smaller G. assimilis females to oviposit more eggs than larger females. This negative trend was unexpected, given previous studies revealed larger G. assimilis females are more fecund (e.g., Bertram & Rook, 2012;Bertram et al, 2016;Loranger & Bertram, 2016b), a relationship found in almost all field crickets studied to date (e.g., G. bimaculatus: Bateman et al, 2001;G. texensis: Shoemaker, 2003;Teleogryllus oceanicus: Simmons & Garcia-Gonzalez, 2007;G.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Third, large females may have larger auditory spiracles, enabling them to better locate males that are calling (Gwynne & Bailey, ). Fourth, because larger female crickets tend to be more fecund and therefore should be preferred as mates by males, they should encounter more males in their lifetime (Ah‐King & Gowaty, ; Bateman, Gilson, & Ferguson, ; Bertram et al, ; Bonduriansky, ; Gowaty & Hubbell, ; Loranger & Bertram, ). Greater male encounter rates would alter their demographic stochasticity and the fitness benefits they could accrue from mating, conditions favouring greater mate discrimination (Ah‐King & Gowaty, ; Gowaty & Hubbell, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%